BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

F.A.No.182 OF 2012 AGAINST C.C.NO.50 OF 2011 DISTRICT 

Between:

N.Shanthammath                                                                                                         

M/s Bajaj Allianz general Insurancerd                                                                      

Counsel for the Appellants    Counsel for the Respondent                         

QUORUM:  

                       SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

FRIDAY 

Oral Order (As per Sri***

1.    The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant.

2.             

3.             

4.            `3,25,000/- and she `2,20,000/- on different dates and an amount of`1,00,000/- on 2.05.2009 on which date she   `1

5.             

6.               

7.      

8.            

i)            Whether the appellant is entitled to the amount sought for from the

ii)          To what relief?

9.            :    `3`1,05,000/-.

10.   `1,00,000/- 

11.   

“But it is the case of the complainant that she never sold her vehicle to Mr.P.Shekhar or any other person as on the date of accident.  

12.    

“In fact the complainant did not 

13.           

14.   

15.           

16.           

17.           

18.            

19.           

20.            The decision at the stage where the sale of the vehicle is disputed is not applicable. 

21.              

22.             In the result the appeal is allowed setting aside the order passed by the District Forum. The matter is remitted back to the District Forum.The District Forum is directed to dispose of the matter in accordance with law.In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. 

                                                                                                                       MEMBER

                                                                                                                                                      కెఎంకె*