Delhi

South Delhi

CC/585/2013

M/S RAI FOUNDATION - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S AXIS BANK - Opp.Party(s)

19 Jan 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II UDYOG SADAN C 22 23
QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016
 
Complaint Case No. CC/585/2013
( Date of Filing : 05 Dec 2013 )
 
1. M/S RAI FOUNDATION
A-41 MICE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHI 110044
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S AXIS BANK
E-146 OPP-PVR ANUPAM, SAKET NEW DELHI 110017
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  MONIKA A. SRIVASTAVA PRESIDENT
  KIRAN KAUSHAL MEMBER
  UMESH KUMAR TYAGI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None
......for the Complainant
 
None
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 19 Jan 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II

Udyog Sadan, C-22 & 23, Qutub Institutional Area

(Behind Qutub Hotel), New Delhi- 110016

 

Case No.585/2013

 

M/s Rai Foundation,

A-41, MCIE,

Mathura Road, New Delhi - 110044                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ….Complainant

Versus

 

M/s Axis Bank,

E-146, Opp. PVR Anupam,

Saket, New Delhi - 110017

                                                                                                         ….Opposite Party

    

       Date of Institution    :        05.12.2013

       Date of Order            :        19.01.2022

Coram:

Ms. Monika A Srivastava, President

Ms. Kiran Kaushal, Member

Sh. U.K. Tyagi, Member

ORDER

 

President: Ms. Monika A Srivastava

 

The present complaint has been instituted by a Philanthropic Trust and is signed and filed by Shri Suresh Sachdev, trustee of the Trust.

OP has taken a preliminary objection that complainant on its own admission is a trust therefore does not come within the definition of “complainant” as well as “person” as defined in section 2(1)(b) and (m) of Consumer Protection Act 1986. It is thus prayed that the complaint be dismissed.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Pratibha Pratishtan vs Manager, Canara Bank AIR 2017 SC 1303 has considered the issue whether a complaint can be filed by a Trust under the provision of Consumer Protection Act 1986. It was held

“A reading of the definition of the words 'complaint', 'complainant' and 'consumer' makes it clear that a Trust cannot invoke the provisions of the Act in respect of any allegation on the basis of which a complaint could be made”.

XXXXXXX

“On a plain and simple reading of all the above provisions of the Act it is clear that a Trust is not a person and therefore not a consumer. Consequently, it cannot be a complainant and cannot file a consumer dispute under the provisions of the Act”

In view of the above, this Commission is of the view that the present complaint is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.

File be consigned to the record room after giving copy of the order to the parties. Order be uploaded on the website.

 

 

 
 
[ MONIKA A. SRIVASTAVA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ KIRAN KAUSHAL]
MEMBER
 
 
[ UMESH KUMAR TYAGI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.