Delhi

StateCommission

A/717/2014

MR. VINOD NADAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S AVIA AUTO SERVICES PVT. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

23 Sep 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/717/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/05/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/456/2014 of District East Delhi)
 
1. MR. VINOD NADAR
R/O 32, PARYATAN VIHAR, B 4 VASUNDHRA ENCLAVE, DELHI-110096.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S AVIA AUTO SERVICES PVT. LTD.
77 F.I.E. PATPARGANJ INDUSTRIAL AREA, DELHI-110092.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

Date of Decision:23.09.2014

 

First Appeal- 717/2014

(Arising out of the order dated 29.05. 2014 passed in Complainant Case No. 456/2014 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Saini Enclave, Delhi)

Mr. Vinod Kumar,

Son of Mr. Virender Singh,

R/o 32, Paryatan Vihar,

B 4, Vasundhra Enclave,

Delhi-110096.

                                                                                            ….Appellant

 

Versus

  1. M/s. Avia Auto Services Pvt. Ltd.,

77 F.I.E. Patparganj Industrial Area,

  •  

 

  1. M/s. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

DLF Industrial Plot,

  1.  

Near Metro Station,

New Delhi-110 015.

 

  1. M/s. Renault India Private Limited,

Regional Office-North,

Suite No-11, Vatika Business Centre,

  1.  

Sushant Lok I, Phase 1,

Block A, MG Road,

Gurgaon 122002.

 

 

  1. M/s. Divine Autotech Private Ltd.,

Authorized Workshop for Respondent No.1,

Bodyshop 67/3, Mundka, Ghevra,

GT Karnal Road, Industrial Area,

Azadpur, Delhi.

 

  •  

CORAM

Justice Veena Birbal, President

Salma Noor, Member

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

1.     Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?

2.      To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

  1. We have heard Shri Ramnesh Jerath, Counsel for the Appellant.

 

  1. Present appeal is directed against the order dated 29.5.14 passed by the Ld. District Forum, Saini Enclave, Delhi.

 

  1. In brief, the vehicle Renault Duster HP RXL 85 PS was purchased by the complainant on 07.06.2013.  The vehicle had run 2000 km when its engine seized on 28.10.2013.  Ld. District Forum dismissed the complaint observing that it was simply a case of defect in the bottle of coolant. 

 

  1. Perusal of the complaint shows that the complainant has alleged that there was an “engine collapse”.  Be that it as may, matter requires adjudication.  In the circumstances, matter is remanded back to the Ld. District Forum with the directions to dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law.  Appellant to appear in the District Forum, Saini Enclave, Delhi on 19.11.2014.

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.