BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD

F.A.No. OF 240 OF 2008 AGAINST C.C. No. 357 OF 2007 DISTRICT FORUM ONGOLE

Between:

K.Ramalinga Reddy S/o Narasa Reddy
S/o Narasa Reddy aged about 55 years
R/o Pernamitta Village, S.N.Padu Mandal
Prakasam District

                                       A N D

1.                  2.                  

3.                                                                                       Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondents

QUORUM:  

AND

SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

                                       1.    

2.        `46,659/- in accordance with CC bills revised from March 2006 to October 2007 subject to short fall. `46,659/-.  

3.          The opposite party no.2 went to the house of the complainant to take the reading at the time the complainant was present and recorded the consumption units as 11268 as final reading as on that date. 

4.    `46,659/- and served the bill.  `46,659/-.  The contract load is 2.74 kilo watts but the connected load is 6.82 kilo watts.  

5.      

6.    

7.    

8.        

9.    USAUS  

10.        `46,659/- has been in dispute. US India  

11.      

1.     1 ½ ton A/C 2.     Geyser

3.     Grinder

4.     Refrigerator

5.     Colour TV

6.     Fans

7.     Table lights

8.     6 bulbs

12.     `46,659/-   `46,659/- which in any manner cannot be said to be arbitrary or against the evidence on record. 

13.    

                                                                                                                                                                                     KMK*