Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/12/5

LATHA RAMACHANDRAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT.LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR K.A.SAJU - Opp.Party(s)

M.V.JOY

31 Jul 2012

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/5
 
1. LATHA RAMACHANDRAN
W/O T.P.RAVIKUMAR, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT NANDANAM, HARISREE COLONY, VADAKKANTHARA P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN: 678 012
PALAKKAD
ERNAKULAM
2. T.P.RAVIKUMAR
S/O P.P.ACHUTHA PISHARADY, RESIDING AT NANDANAM, HARISREE COLONY, VADAKKANTHARA P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN 678 012
PALAKKAD
KERALA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT.LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR K.A.SAJU
APPLE TOWER, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY BYE PASS ROAD, EDAPPALLY P.O., PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682 025
ERNAKULAM
KERALA
2. K.A.SAJU
MANAGING DIRECTOR, APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT LTD, S/O T.K.ABDUL KHADER, RESIDING AT POOVATHUMMOOTTIL KADAVIL, EDAPPALLY P.O., KOCHI-682 024
ERNAKULAM
KERALA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE MRS. C.K.LEKHAMMA Member
 HONORABLE MR. PROF:PAUL GOMEZ Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

PBEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM.

                       Dated this the 31st day of  July 2012

                                                                                 Filed on : 04/01/2012

Present :

          Shri. A  Rajesh,                                                     President.

Shri. Paul Gomez,                                                  Member.

Smt. C.K. Lekhamma,                                           Member

C.C. No. 5/2012

     Between

 

 1. Latha Ramachandran,                         :        Complainant

     W/o. T.P. Ravikumar, Govt. Employee,  (By Adv. M.V. Joy,

     res. at Nandanam Harisree Colony,          ivth floor, Metro Plaza,

     Vadakkanthara P.O.,                                 Ernakulam-682 018)

     Palakkad, Pin-678 012.

2. T.P. Ravikumar,

    S/o. P.P. Achutha Pisharady,

    Business, resi.

    at Nandanam Harisree Colony,

    Vadakkanthara P.O.,

    Palakkad, Pin-678 012.

                                                          And

 

 1. M/s. Apple A day properties Pvt. Ltd.,:        Opposite parties

     Rep. by its Managing Director,                         (Absent)

     K.A. Saju, Apple Tower,

     Palarivattom,

     Edappally Bye pass road,

     Edappally P.O., Palarivattom,

     Kochi-682 025.

 

  2. K.A. Saju, Managing Director,

     Apple A day properties private Ltd.

     S/o. T.K. Abdhul Khader,

     res. at Poovathummottil Kadavil,

     Edappally P.O., Kochi-682 024.


 

                                               

                                          O R D E R

C.K. lekhamma, Member.

 

          Brief facts of the complainant’s case are as follows:

          The complainants  entered an agreement with the opposite parties for construction of an apartment No. E-101 in their project by name Nano Homes.  They had paid Rs. 10,000/- as booking charges as per the schedule of payment on 26-01-2009.  On 29-01-2009 the complainant had paid Rs. 2,90,000/- as balance amount of booking.  On 30-04-2009 he paid Rs. 2,41,635/- and on 14-12-2009 another amount of Rs. 1,16,675/- was also paid to the opposite parties. As per the agreement for constructions of Nano Homes the opposite party  will construct the apartment and will finish the work within 24 months with effect from 15-04-2009 and offered handing over of the key to the complainant.  On 26-05-2011 the complainant  was informed that work of the  project is still in progress and is nearing completion.  The complainants visited the work site of the project.  As on that date, the site was not even developed, and the piling woks not started. Hence dissatisfied with the promises assured by the opposite party the 1st complainant had filed a petition before the Palarivattom Police Station.   Both the opposite parties have assured the complainants again that key of the apartment would be handed over in June 2011.  But they did not turn up.   

          The complainants are seeking the following reliefs against the opposite parties.

          a. to direct the opposite parties to refund an amount of Rs. 6,58,310/- paid by the complainants to the opposite parties

          b. To direct the opposite party to pay compensation for mental agony and other incidental expenses to the complainants.

 

          2. The complainant appeared though counsel. At the outset the opposite parties appeared thereafter they opted to remain absent during the  proceedings.  The complainant filed proof affidavit  Exts. A1 to A8 were marked.  Heard the counsel for the complainant.

 

          3.  The points that arose for consideration are as follows:

          i. Whether the complainant is entitled to get refund of Rs. 6,58,310/- from the

            opposite parties?

          ii. Compensation and costs if any

 

          4. Points Nos. i&ii.  The case of the complainants is that they had booked an apartment with the opposite parties and paid the booking charges of Rs. 10000/- on 26-01-2009, Rs. 2,90,000/- on 29-01-2009, Rs. 2,41,635 on 30-04-2009 and Rs. 1,16,675 on 14-12-2009.  It is contented that  the opposite parties assured that they would finish the work of the apartment within 24 months with effect from 15-04-2009 and also offered to hand over the key to the complainants.  But till date the opposite parties could not complete the construction work.

 

          Exbt. A3 construction agreement was  on 15-04-2009.  The time stipulation mentioned for completion of the construction work is within 24 months  with effect from 15-04-2009.  Ext. A4 to A7  receipts are the evidence of payments made by the complainant to the opposite parties.  The complainant contented that the opposite parties could  not start the construction work so far and the opposite parties failed to handover the possession of the apartment  in accordance of Ext. A3 agreement.   The opposite parties failed to deliver the possession of the apartment within the time stipulation mentioned in Ext. A3.  In that case the complainants are entitled to get compensation for the delay in delivery of the  apartment.  Admittedly there is no clause in Ext. A3 agreement to pay compensation in case the opposite parties fail to deliver the possession to the complainant.  Indisputably, the complainants have had to suffer mental agony and other hardships though there is no provision in Ext. A3 to pay compensation.  As per the evidence it appears that the complainants altogether paid Rs. 6,58,310/- on different dates in the  2009 itself.  In view of the above we are of the considered view  that the complainants are entitled to get refund of Rs. 6,58,310/- along with 12% interest  p.a.  from the date of each  receipts of the payments till realization.  Seemingly the complainant has had to suffer  mental agony and unnecessary inconveniences for no fault of his only goes to show that a consumer has been wronged which calls for costs of the proceedings. We fix it as Rs. 10,000/-.

 

          5.   Therefore, we allow the complaint and direct as follows:

(i)                The opposite parties shall refund the amounts as per Ext. A4 to A7 receipts together with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of each receipt till realization.

(ii)              The opposite parties shall pay Rs. 10,000/- by way of costs to the complainant for the reasons stated above.

          The above said order shall be complied with within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.             

                    Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 31st day of  July 2012.

 

                                                                                   Sd/-

                                                                   C.K. Lekhamma, Member.

                                                                                                Sd/-

          A  Rajesh, President.

                   Sd/-

                                                                    Paul Gomez, Member.

                                                                   Forwarded/By Order,

 

 

                                                                   Senior Superintendent.

                                                         

                                        


 

                                                 Appendix

 

Complainant’s exhibits :

 

                    Ext.   A1               :         Copy of brochure

                             A2              :         Copy of agreement for sale of

                                                        undivided share in land

                             A3              :         Copy of agreement for construction of

                                                       Nano Homes

                             A4              :         Cash receipt voucher dt. 26-01-2009

                             A5              :         Bank receipt voucher dt. 29-01-2009

                             A6              :         Receipt dt. 30/04/2009

                             A7              :         receipt dt. 14-12-2009

                             A8              :         copy of FIR                                                       

 

 Opposite party’s Exhibits :        Nil    

 

 
 
[HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE MRS. C.K.LEKHAMMA]
Member
 
[HONORABLE MR. PROF:PAUL GOMEZ]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.