Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/972/06

Mr. S.Y.Narayana Moorthy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ms APCPDCL - Opp.Party(s)

29 Sep 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/972/06
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Kurnool)
 
1. Mr. S.Y.Narayana Moorthy
Plot No.305 A, Sumitra Apts, Tirumalagiri, Sec-bad.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Ms APCPDCL
Lalbazar Section, Sec-bad.
Andhra Pradesh
2. M/s APCPDCL
Asst.Accounts officer, ERO-XII, APCPDCL, Bowenpally,Hyd.
Hyderabad
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.

 

F.A. No. 972/2006 against C.D. 151/2006,Hyderabad

 

Between:

 

S. Y. Narayana Murthy

S/o. Late S. Seetharama Sastry

Age: 73 years,

Senior Citizen, Sr. Journalist

R/o. Plot No. 305A

Sumitra Apartments

Tirumalgiri, Secunderabad.                                                           

AndhraPradeshState

(Now called as A.P. Central Power

Distribution Company Ltd.)

Rep. by its

Assistant Engineer, Lal Bazar Section

Secunderabad.

 

1.Accounts Officer, ERO-XII

2.APCPDCL, Bowenpally

Hyderabad.Opposite Parties

                                     

Counsel for the Appellant:                          

Counsel for the Respondents:

 

QUORUM:

 

 

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.

                                                                                                                 

 

MONDAY, THE 

 

 

ORAL ORDER:

 

***

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           Hyderabad                 After 2-1/2 years, on 30.11.2005      Rs. 12,448.67 ps.    this amount from Rs. 10,712/-.      

 

 

 

The latest bill Dt. 9.3.2006 showed the arrears at Rs. 32,351/-.   

 

            

 

The Dist. Forum   

 

                   

 

 

           Hyderabad, when he was directed to pay electricity bills from 11/1995 to 1/1998.         

It was       

 

          

 

 

 

 

the bill Dt. 9.3.2006.         

 

              particulars of bill  

 

 

 

 

 

 him and there is no dispute at all.”      repeated notices was not able to substantiate the bills        

 

                 that I owe them for the period from 2/1998 to 10/2001 only     

 

 

filing an appeal against their Members. 

 We may add herein that the complainant did not allege anything about       Rs. 12,448/- and was held to be due, after giving deduction of Rs. 1,744/-         

                    

 

 

 

PRESIDENT           

                                               

 

*pnr

 

 

 

 

“CORRECTED – O.K.”

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.