Haryana

StateCommission

EA/4/2019

RAJESH PANWAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES - Opp.Party(s)

Parveen Gupta

23 Aug 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Execution Application No. EA/4/2019
( Date of Filing : 05 Feb 2019 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/134/2017
 
1. RAJESH PANWAR
HARYANA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  S . P . Sood PRESIDING MEMBER
  Suresh Chander Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 23 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

 

 

                                                    Execution Application No.04 of 2019 in

                                              Consumer Complaint No.134 of 2017

                                          Date of the Institution: 07.02.2019

                                  Date of Decision: 23.08.2022

 

 

Rajesh Panwar S/o Sh. Banwari Lal Flat No.D-24, Rashmi Appartments, Harsh Vihar Pitampura, New Delhi-110034.

 

                                      .….Decree Holder-Complainant

Versus

1.      M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. (Through its Managing Director/Chairman/Director) 115, Ansal Bhawan, 16-Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001.

 

2.      Sh. Sushil Ansal, Chairman & Whole Time Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. 115, Ansal Bhawan, 16-Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001.

3.      Anil Kumar, Managing Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. 115, Ansal Bhawan, 16-Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001.

         

                                                   .….Judgment Debtors-Opposite parties

 

CORAM:      Mr.S.P. Sood, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.

 

Present:-     Mr. Parveen Gupta, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant.

                   Mr. Ajay Ghanghas, counsel for the Judgment Debtors-opposite Parties.

 

                    

                                      O R D E R

 

S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

 

 

                   Mr. Parveen Gupta, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant has suffered a statement that he does not want to pursue further with the present execution application and he may be permitted to withdraw the same as the full amount has been received from the Judgment Debtors-opposite parties. His statement in this regard recorded separately.

2.                In pursuance of the respective statement made by Mr. Parveen Gupta, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant the present execution application is hereby stands dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to the records.

 

 

August, 23rd, 2022             S.C. Kaushik                                      S.P. Sood                                                            Member                                   Judicial Member

                                           Addl. Bench                              Addl. Bench           

J.Y.

 
 
[ S . P . Sood]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ Suresh Chander Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.