Haryana

StateCommission

CC/253/2018

RAJEEV PARNAMI AND ANOTHER - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

PARVEEN GUPTA

07 Apr 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/253/2018
( Date of Filing : 25 Apr 2018 )
 
1. RAJEEV PARNAMI AND ANOTHER
H.NO. 947, SECTOR 12, OPP DAV SCHOOL, PANIPAT.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD.
606, 6TH FLOOR, INDRA PRAKASH, 21, BARAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  S . P . Sood PRESIDING MEMBER
  Suresh Chander Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 07 Apr 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

 

                    Consumer Complaint No.253 of 2018

                            Date of the Institution:25.04.2018

                      Date of Decision: 07.04.2022

 

1.      Mr. Rajeev Parnami, S/o Shri Sham Dass Parnami, R/o House No.947, Sector-12, OPP DAV School, Panipat.

 2.     Mr. Harsimranjeet Singh, S/o Shri Manmohan Singh, R/o House No.947, Sector-12, OPP DAV School, Panipat.

….Complainants

Versus

1.      M/s Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. (Through its authorized representative) Regd. Office-606, 6th Floor, Indra Prakash, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001.

2.      Mr. Deepak Ansal, CMD M/s Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. Regd. Office-606, 6th Floor, Indra Prakash, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001.

3.      M/s Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. (Through its Manager/Incharge). Ansal Town, Sector-36, Near Namestey Chowk, Karnal.

                                                .….Opposite parties

 

CORAM:    Mr.S.P. Sood, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.

 

 

Present:-    Mr. Parveen Gupta, counsel for the complainants.

                   Mr. Abhishekh Singla, proxy counsel for Mr. Vikas Chatrath, counsel for the opposite parties.

 

                                      O R D E R

 

S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

 

                  

                   Mr. Parveen Gupta, counsel for the complainants has made a statement that he may be permitted to withdraw the present complaint with the liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before appropriate authority. His statement in this regard recorded separately.

 

 

 

2.               Present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn, in pursuance of the statement made by learned counsel for the complainants. However, complainant is at liberty to file a fresh complaint before appropriate authority. File be consigned to the records.

 

 

April 07th, 2022                                 S.C. Kaushik                          S.P. Sood                                                                                    Member                                  Judicial Member

                                                            Addl. Bench                           Addl. Bench  

                                                                       

J.Y.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[ S . P . Sood]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ Suresh Chander Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.