Haryana

Yamunanagar

CC/556/2013

Surinder Singh S/o Jagmal Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Ansal API Properties And Infrastructure Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Devender Kuamr

12 Sep 2017

ORDER

Surinder Singla Vs. M/S Ansal API

CC No.556 of 2013

 

Present:       Mr. Devinder Kumar Advocate for the complainant. 

                     Mr. Hitesh Gambhir, Advocate for ops.            

 

                   Today the case was fixed for arguments.  At this stage, Counsel for the complainant has made a separate statement in which he states that he wants to withdraw his present complaint with liberty to file afresh before the appropriate authority.

                   Heard. In view of the statement, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file afresh before the appropriate authority. However, the complainant is at liberty to approach the appropriate Court/Forum on the same cause of action, if so advised. Further, the complainant would be entitled to the benefit of the provision of Section 14(2) of the limitation Act for the period during which proceeding under the Consumer Protection Act remained pending before this District Forum. as per case law titled as “Luxmi Engineering Works Vs. P.S.G. Industrial Institute (1995) III, SCC Page-583. Copies of this order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs as per rules. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

 

                                                                                                SATPAL

                                                                                                PRESIDENT

                                                                                                12.09.2017

                  

          VEENA RANI SHEOKAND            S.C. SHARMA

          MEMBER                                          MEMBER