West Bengal

Hooghly

CC/223/2024

ARNAB DAS - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S ALEHA CONSTRUCTION - Opp.Party(s)

SNEHASIS MODAK

09 Dec 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2021
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPOSITE PARTY
 
Complaint Case No. CC/223/2024
( Date of Filing : 02 Dec 2024 )
 
1. ARNAB DAS
3/26/2 DR BC ROY SARANI P.O- MOREPUKUR, 712250
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S ALEHA CONSTRUCTION
VILL - KAPASHARIA , P.O- BORA , P.S- CHANDITALA, HOOGHLY, 712306
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
2. SK MAHAMMED ARIK SAMAN
VILL - KAPASHARIA , P.O- BORA , P.S- CHANDITALA, HOOGHLY, 712306
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
3. SK. MAHAMMED ARIF JAMAN
VILL - KAPASHARIA , P.O- BORA , P.S- CHANDITALA, HOOGHLY, 712306
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
4. SK USMAN
24/A MIAJAN DARJI LANE , P.O AND P.S- SERMAPORE , HOOGHLY, 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
5. KARUNA HARI
25 ROYGHAT LANE , P.O AND P.S- SERAMPORE , HOOGHLY, 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
6. ANGURBALA RANA
25 ROYGHAT LANE , P.O AND P.S SERAMPORE , HOOGHLY, 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
7. SURAJIT RANA
25 ROYGHAT LANE , P.O AND P.S SERAMPORE , HOOGHLY, 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
8. SUBHASIS RANA
25 ROYGHAT LANE , P.O AND P.S SERAMPORE , HOOGHLY, 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
9. SUTAPA DAS
BAGANPARA CHOTBAHERA KONNAGAR KANAIPUR , P.S- UTTARPARA , 712245
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
10. SUMITA MONDAL
25 ROYGHAT LANE , P.O NAD P.SP- SERMAPORE , 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
11. DEBASISH BISWAS
25 ROYGHAT LANE P.O AND P.S SERAMPORE , HOOGHLY, 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
12. ARCHANA DEY
114 JOYKULLA MOLLA ROAD , P.O AND P.S THAKUPUKUR , 700063
SOUTH 24 PARGANA
WEST BENGAL
13. MALATI BISWAS
16A ROYGHAT LANE , P.O AND P.S- SERAMPORE , 712201
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 09 Dec 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Today is fixed for admission hearing.

Complainant is found present and ready.

In course of hearing the complainant has given emphasis on the documents which have been filed along with the complaint petition and also pointed out that the complainant has purchased the shop room. But facts remain that at nowhere in the complaint petition it has been stated that the complainant has purchased the said shop room leading his livelihood. Moreover, no documents as such income tax return, municipal tax return etc have been filed to show that he is running the said shop room for the purpose of earning his livelihood.

In view of such position and as per the case law which is reported in 2024 (3) Indian Civil Cases page 291, this District Commission is of the view that this case is not maintainable.

So, this case is not admitted and it is rejected.

No order is passed as to costs.

Complainant is given liberty to file the same afresh on the self same cause of action after curing the defect.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.