Haryana

Faridabad

CC/381/2022

Shaurya Salwan - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Air India Ltd. & Others - Opp.Party(s)

N K Sharma

01 Aug 2023

ORDER

Distic forum Faridabad, hariyana
faridabad
final order
 
Complaint Case No. CC/381/2022
( Date of Filing : 19 Jul 2022 )
 
1. Shaurya Salwan
H. No. 468, Sec-28, FBD
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Air India Ltd. & Others
113, Gurudwara Rakabganj Sansad Marg Area New Delhi
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 01 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ,Faridabad.

 

Consumer Complaint  No. 381/2022

 Date of Institution:19.07.2022

Date of Order:.01.08.2023.

Mr. Shaurya Salwan r/o H.No.468, Sector-28, Faridabad – 121008, Haryana.

                                                          …….Complainant……..

                                                Versus

M/s. Air India Limited, Airlines House, 113, Gurudwara Rakabganj road, Sansad Marg Area, New Delhi – 110 001.

                                      AND

M/s. Easy Trip Planner Ltd. Building No. 223, Patparganj Industrial Area, Patparganj, New Delhi – 110 092.

                                                                              …Opposite parties

BEFORE:            Amit Arora……………..President

Mukesh Sharma…………Member.

Indira Bhadana………….Member.

PRESENT:                   Sh. Deepak Gautam,   counsel for the complainant.

                             Sh. Anuj Shrotniya, counsel for opposite party No.1.

                             Sh. Deepak Kumar, counsel for opposite party No.2.

 

ORDER:

                             Today the case was fixed for arguments.  Instead of arguing the  case,  Shri Deepak Gautam, counsel for the complainant has made a statement  that  “I only press  for the harassment, interest  and litigation expenses and any other relief if the Commission may given to the complainant..

                             On the basis of the statement of the counsel for the complainant, the Commission is of the opinion that no doubt they have harassed the complainant mentally.  Hence, they are negligent on their part.  Deficiency of service is proved.  Hence the complaint is  allowed qua the harassment & litigation charges.

2.                Opposite parties  are directed to pay Rs.1100/- as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment. Opposite parties are also directed to pay Rs.1100/- as litigation expenses to the complainant. Compliance of this order  be made within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.  Copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs. File be consigned to the record room.

Announced on:  01.08.2023                                 (Amit Arora)

                                                                                  President

                     District Consumer Disputes

           Redressal  Commission, Faridabad.

 

                                                            (Mukesh Sharma)

                Member

          District Consumer Disputes

                                                                                Redressal Commission, Faridabad.

 

                                                         (Indira Bhadana)

                Member

          District Consumer Disputes

                                                                             Redressal Commission, Faridabad.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.