Kerala

StateCommission

A/14/200

Munshid Ali - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Air Asia Rep. by its Airport Operation Manager - Opp.Party(s)

S Reghukumar

30 Dec 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/14/200
(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/12/2013 in Case No. CC/10/342 of District Ernakulam)
 
1. Munshid Ali
S/o Ali, Cheriya Thoppiloakam, Kundungal, Kozhikkode
2. Sheriyar
Kannarambath, Thiruvannur, Kozhikkode
3. Hijas Mohammed
S/o Mohammed, Attarwala Apartments, Indira Gandhi Road, Kozhikkode
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Air Asia Rep. by its Airport Operation Manager
Cochin International Air Port, Nedumbassery, Ernakulam
2. M/s Air Asia Rep. by its Asst. General Manager
Sales and Marketing India(Air Asia), C/o Track India, 7, Ponmari Towers, Montitec Lane, Egmore, Chennai - 8
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE SRI P.Q.BARKATH ALI PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 30 Dec 2016
Final Order / Judgement

THE KERALA STATE  CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

APPEAL     NO- 200/2014

JUDGMENT     DATED. 30/12/2016

(Appeal filed against the order in CC.No. 342/2010, CDRF, Ernakulam)

 

PRESENT:-

         

          JUSTICE. SRI. P.Q.BARKATH ALI:  PRESIDENT

 

APPELLANTS:

  1. Munshid Ali, S/o Ali,

Cheriya Thoppiloakam,

Kundungal, Kozhikode.

  1. Sheriyar, Kannarambath,

Thiruvannur, Kozhikode.

  1. Hijas Mohammed,

S/o. Mohammed,

Attarwala Apartments,

Indiar Gnadhi Road, Kozhikode.

 

(By Adv. Shyam Padman)

 

              V/S

 

  •  
  1. M/s. Air Asia,

Rep. by its Airport Operation,

Manager, cochin International,

Air port, Nedumbassery,

  •  

                                                          (2)

 

  1. M/s Air Asia,

Rep. by its Asst. General Manager,

Sales and Marketing India ) Air Asia),

C/o Track India, 7, Ponmari Towers,

Montietec Lane, Egmore, Chennai-8.

( By Adv. B.S. Sivaji , V.R. Swami Nathan)

 

JUDGMENT

JUSTICE. SRI. P.Q.BARKATH ALI: PRESIDENT

          This is an appeal filed by the complainants  in CC.No. 342/2010 on the file  of Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam challenging the order of the Forum dated December 21, 2013 regarding the  adequacy of  compensation awarded.

          The case of the complainants as  testified by PW1 the first complainant  and as detailed  in the complaint   before the Forum in brief is this. 

          Complainants booked Air ticket on the flight  of the opposite parties for the  journey to  Kuala Lumpur  and also the returned ticket  to   Cochin.   On December  16, 2009 complainants reached at Kuala

                                                                   (3)

Lumpur  LCC Terminal.  After customs clearance  immigration, security checking and issuing boarding  passes they were restrained at the  bodying gate by the security officer of the opposite parties without assigning any reason.  The visa  of the complainants were cancelled at the  air port upon the issuance  of boarding passes.  They were compelled  to spend all the  night in the air port.  Complainants had to purchase separate  ticket  for the return journey to  Thiruvananthapuram  as  there was no flight  available  to Cochin on the next  day.  They had to spent  1,734/-  Ringitt  Malasia each .  Therefore complainants claimed compensation of Rs. 4,50,000/-  and a cost of Rs.  15,000/- . 

          Opposite parties are M/s. Air Asia represented by its  Air Port operation Manager  at Cochin  and the  Assistant  General Manager at  Chennai.  They  in their  version contended  thus  before the Forum.    The complainants  checked in on  their  flight to   Cochin 13. 14 hours which  is  approximately   just 12 minutes before the  counter closed.  Complainants  agreed to  purchase the flight  ticket to 

                                                                   (4)

Thiruvananthapurm since the flight  of the opposite parties to Cochin on the  next  day  was fully booked .  Therefore complaint has to be dismissed.                                                  

The first complainant was examined as PW1 and Exbt. A1 to A5 were marked on  their side and DW1 was examined  and Exbt. B1 was marked by  the opposite party before the Forum.  On an appreciation of evidence  the Forum found that there is deficiency in service on the part of the opposite  parties and directed them to pay a  compensation  Rs. 25,000/- to each complainants and a cost of Rs. 2000/-.  Complainants have come up in appeal challenging the order of the Forum in so far as it did not grant   adequate compensation. 

          Heard both the counsels.

          The only question which arise for consideration  is  whether compensation awarded by the Forum is   adequate.

         

                                                                     (5)

The Forum awarded a compensation of Rs. 25,000/- on the ground  that complainants  had to take ticket to  Thiruvananthapurm by spending  Rs. 1,734/-.  But actually it was  1,734/- Ringitt Malasia  which would be equal to Rs. 34,650/-,  as seen from the documents produced  by  the complainants.  That  being so the compensation awarded by the  Forum  Rs. 25,000/- each  to the complainants   appears to be inadequate.  Taking in to account the  fact that   complainants  had to spent  Rs. 1,560/- towards baggage charges  3,408/- to each to convience  fee Rs. 8,744/- towards  terminal transfer  charges and 12,500/- paid for the original  return booked ticket,    I feel that a compensation of Rs. 10,000/- to  each  of the complainants would be  reasonable.

          In the result  appeal is allowed.  The impugned order of the Forum   is modified to the  effect  that  opposite parties  are directed to  pay a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to each of the complainants   and a cost

 

 

                                                                   (6)

of Rs. 5,000/- in addition to the cost of Rs. 2000/- ordered by the Forum. 

 

JUSTICE. P.Q.BARKATH ALI: PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sh/-

 

 

                                                                   

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE SRI P.Q.BARKATH ALI]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.