Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1189/08

MR.REDDY MANOHAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S ADITYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MGMT PG CENTER - Opp.Party(s)

M/S D.VIJENDRA KISHORE

23 Feb 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1189/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Chittoor-I)
 
1. MR.REDDY MANOHAR
H.NO.6-6-96, GANDHI ROAD, KARIMNAGAR DIST.
KARIMNAGAR
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S ADITYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MGMT PG CENTER
REP.BY ITS CO-ORDINATOR, SUDHAKAR OPP.UNIVERSITY ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE, SUBEDARI, HANAMKONDA.
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. MS UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS
VICE CHANCELLOR,CHEPUAK, CHENNAI.
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
3. MS INSTITUTE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY
THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MADRAS, CHEPUAK.
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :HYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.1189/2008 against C.C.No.45/2008, Dist Forum, Karimnagar.

 

 

 

Between:

 

Reddy 

Aged about 44 years, Occ: Pvt. Teacher,

R/o.H.No.6-6-96,Gandhi Road,

Karimnagar Dist.

                                                                     

1.Aditya Institute 

  

  

  

   UniversityArts & ScienceCollege,

  

 

2. Vice Chancellor,UniversityMadras,

   

 

3. The Controller of Examinations ,

   DistanceEducationUniversity,

   Madras, Chepuak,

                                                                  

       Counsel for the Appellants      

 

Counsel for the Respondents  

                                        

CORAM:THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT

AND

SMT.M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY,

TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN.

 

Oral Order : (Per Smt. M.Shreesha, Hon’ble Member).

***

 

         Aggrieved    

                     st           nd                he was unable to attend    The complainant Warangal Warangal          compensation. 

 

         UniversityMadras                              

 

            opp.party                     

 

           ndndyear course of examinations   

It is the complainant’s case       receipt issued by opposite party no.1 for B.Tech T.C. and original degree certificate. The complainant submits that after verification of all the certificates, opp.parties confirmed the P.G. seat and he paid the balance amount of Rs.915/- on 5.4.2005       th     

 

           

       

 

               for M.Sc. Maths,            

 

In the result this appeal is allowed in part and the order of the District Forum is modified with the direction to the Syndicate to examine the complainant’s eligibility criterion and as submitted by the learned counsel for the opp.party the complainant be allowed to sit for the second year examination and on his passing of the exam the relevant    

                                                                                                              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.