West Bengal

North 24 Parganas

CC/105/2020

Sri Sukanta Ghosh S/o Sri Deb Kr. Ghosh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S Aakaash Udyyog Rep. by Mr Aakaash M Kumar - Opp.Party(s)

Mrina Kanti Roy

16 May 2024

ORDER

DCDRC North 24 Paraganas Barasat
Kolkata-700126.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/105/2020
( Date of Filing : 12 Nov 2020 )
 
1. Sri Sukanta Ghosh S/o Sri Deb Kr. Ghosh
SATYA SAI ABASAN, Flat no. 11, 3rd floor, 11/1 Central Rd., H B Town, PO Sodepur, PS Khardah, Kolkata- 700110.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S Aakaash Udyyog Rep. by Mr Aakaash M Kumar
12, B T Road, Trinayna Apartment, Ground Floor, PO and PS- Belgharia, Kol- 700056.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Daman Prasad Biswas PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Abhijit Basu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

DIST. CONSUMER  DISPUTES  REDRESAL  COMMISSION

                                                                                    NORTH 24 Pgs., BARASAT.

                                                                                          C.C. No. 105/2020

     Date of Filing                 Date of Admission            Date of Disposal

      12.11.2020                        23.12.2020                    16.05.2024

                  

Complainant/s:-

SRI SUKANTA GHOSH, son of Sri Deb Kumar Ghosh, aged about 42 yrs, by faith – Hindu, by Nationality – Indian, by occupation – Service, residing at SATYA SAI ABASAN, Flat No. 11, 3rd floor, 11/1, Central Road, H.B.Town, P.O. – Sodepur, P.S. – Khardah, District North 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700110.

Opposite Party/s:-

1. M/s. AAKASH UDYYOG, a registered proprietorship Firm, having its principal place of business at 12, B.T. Road, Trinayna Apartment, Ground floor, P.O. & P.S. – Belgharia, Kolkata – 700056, District – North 24 Parganas.

2. MR. AAKAASH M. KUMAR, the Proprietor of M/s. AAKAASH UDYYOG and son of Sri Anil Sarkar, by faith – Hindu, by occupation – Business, residing at Premises No. 302, Sunit Banerjee Road, P.O – Ghola Bazar, P.S – Ghola, Kolkata – 700111, District North 24 Parganas.

3. SRI SUJAY RAY, son of late Ranjan Ray, by faith – Hindu, by Nationality – Indian, by occupation – Service, residing at 11/1, Central Road, H.B. Town, P.O – Sodepur, P.S – Khardah, District North 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700110.

4. SMT. SHYAMALI ROY, wife of late Ranjan Roy, by faith – Hindu, by Nationality – Indian, by occupation House wife, residing at 11/1, Central Road, H.B. Town, P.O – Sodepur, P.S – Khardah, District North 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700110.

5. SRI SUDIPTA RAY, son of Sri Shyamal Ray, by faith – Hindu, by Nationality – Indian, by occupation – Service, residing at 11/1, Central Road, H.B. Town, P.O – Sodepur, P.S – Khardah, District North 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700110.

         

P R E S E N T               :- Sri. Daman Prosad Biswas……….President.

                                       :- Sri.  Abhijit Basu…………………. Member.

                  

Contd. To Page No. 2 . . . ./

 

 

 

 

 

: :  2  : :

                   C.C. No. 105/2020

 

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

            Complainant above named filed this complaint under Section 35/36 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the aforesaid Opposite Parties praying for direction to the Opposite Parties to issue completion certificate, compensation amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/-, cost of the case amounting to Rs. 10,000/- and other reliefs.

            He alleged that O.P No. 3-5 are the owners of the land and O.P No. 1 and 2 are the developer. They constructed one G+4 building, Complainant intend to purchase one flat. He entered into an agreement for sale for purchase of a residential flat. Consideration amount was fixed to Rs. 27,75,000/-.

            Complainant paid the entire consideration amount of Rs. 27,75,000/-. Said flat was registered on 18/01/2019 at the office of A.D.S.R. Sodepur, vide Deed no. 152400267 of 2019. Thereafter, Complainant on several occasions asked the O.Ps for issue of completion certificate but O.Ps did not pay any heed. Legal notice was given to the O.Ps but no fruitful result was found. Hence, the Complainant filed this case.

Decisions with Reasons:-

            Case was admitted on 23/12/2020. Notice served upon the O.Ps but they did not turn up.

            On 13/09/2023 was fixed for filing W/V by O.P No. 2, 3 and 4 but they did not file W/V. Case is running ex-parte against O.P No. 2-4 vide order no. 19 dated 05/10/2023. Thereafter, 23/04/2024 was fixed for evidence by the Complainant. On that date Complainant was found absent without any steps till 2:50 p.m. He was asked to file Show Cause by 15/05/2024 as to why necessary order shall not be passed against him.

            On 15/05/2024 Complainant not yet appeared nor filed Show Cause. He did not file original copy of all the necessary documents so that this Commission can adjudicate this case on merit.

            The conduct of the Complainant indicates that he has lost his interest to proceed with this case.                 

            In the result, present case fails

Hence ,

It is

                        Ordered,

 

That the present case be and the same vide no. CC/105/2020 is dismissed against the Opposite Parties but without any order as to costs.

 

Let a plain copy of this order be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR, 2005.

 

Dictated and Corrected by me

 

 

President

 

 

Member                                                                                                          President

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Daman Prasad Biswas]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Abhijit Basu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.