BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:

HYDERABAD.

F.A.No.564/2006Vijayawada.

Between:

1. Vempa Ramesh Kumar, S/o.Sri Subba Rao,

                                                                                   2. M.B.Vasu, S/o.late M.C.Balaram,

And

1. Executive Engineer (Housing) A.P.Housing Board,

2. A.P.Housing Board, rep. by its Chairman,

   Hyderabad.                                                                                                                              

Counsel for the Appellants: Mr.K.Parandhamachari

Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.D.Ranganath Kumar.

 (common in both appeals)

QUORUM:THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT

AND

SMT.M.SHREESHA, MEMBER.

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER,

TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

Oral Order:(Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Hon’ble Member)

***

These appeals are disposed of by a common order since the facts are similar in all these appeals.

F.A.No.564/2006:

Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.38/2005 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna atVijayawada, the complainant preferred this appeal.

The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant

was offered  8-1-1999.  5-3-1999   12-2-200122-3-2001. 18-12-2001 2-7-2004  3-12-200420-12-2004, the first opposite party did not choose to register the flats. 2-7-2004

        The possession of the flat was taken on18-4-1996     10-7-2004    

             18-4-1996. 

It is the case of the complainant that he paid17,928/- by way of instalments on various dates and finally an amount of Rs.49,000/- was paid towards full and final settlement of the loan through challan given by opposite party No.1 dated8-1-1999  

        2-7-2004  

       Loan amount given by HUDCO                                        

                             st

     18-12-2001

                                                                                                                                                                                     It is pertinent to note that the complainant had taken possession of the flat in May, 1996 and paid the entire amount towards the flat on8-1-19998-1-1999. 5-3-1999.    18-12-2001have reduced the final1-1-2000 2-7-200418-12-2001.  

We also rely on the judgement of the National Commission reported in

This aforementioned judgement applies to the facts in the instant case since in this case also possession was taken in 1996. 18-12-2001.

       As seen from the record, to reiterate the complainant had taken possession of the flat in May, 1996 paid the entire amount towards the flat on 8-1-1999 and thereafter in March 2000 and on 18-12-2001 when opposite parties made demand for the increased cost, the appellant had paid Rs.27,430/- vide demand draft dated 2-7-2004.  18-4-19961-6-2004.     

In the result this appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside directing the opposite parties to register the flat in favour of the complainant together with costs of Rs.3,000/-. 

F.A.No.565/2006: