Orissa

Ganjam

CC/95/2016

Smt. Manjula Mohanty, 45 Years, - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s- Kalyani Tradelinks, Rep. by M.D.-cum-Proprietor, - Opp.Party(s)

For the complainant: Sri Deepak Kumar Sukla, Advocates & Associates.

09 Dec 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/95/2016
( Date of Filing : 15 Dec 2016 )
 
1. Smt. Manjula Mohanty, 45 Years,
W/o. Pratap Kum,ar Mohanty, House wife, At. Jyoti Nagar, Towner Lane, P.O-Berhampur, Dist-Ganjam -760001.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s- Kalyani Tradelinks, Rep. by M.D.-cum-Proprietor,
Sri Abhishek Moulik, 1st Floor, Sarkar Building, Above Gangtok Jewellery House, Khudiram Palli, Siliguri, West Bengal, Pin-734001.
2. Sri Abhishek Moulik, Rep. by M.D.-cum-Proprietor,
M/s- Kalyani Tradelinks, 1st Floor, Sarkar Building, Above Gangtok Jewellery House, Khudiram Palli, Siliguri, West Bengal, Pin-734001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:For the complainant: Sri Deepak Kumar Sukla, Advocates & Associates. , Advocate for the Complainant 1
 For the O.Ps: N O N E., Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 09 Dec 2024
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                                DATE OF DISPOSAL: 09.12.2024.

 

 

 

PER:  SRI SATISH KUMAR PANIGRAHI, PRESIDENT(I/C)

 

            Both parties are found absent today on repeated call and they have not taken any steps also today.

On perusal of case record it is found that, the Complainant has filed this case for deficiency in services rendered by the Opposite Parties. Accordingly the case was admitted on 22.12.2016 by the Commission and notice was also issued to the Ops on the 22.12.2016. On perusal of record it is found that both parties are found absence since 20.09.2017 till today and not taken any steps in any point of time. The complainant probably does not want to proceed in this case any further. In view of above circumstances, the Commission feels to dispose of the case of the complaint.

Hence in the result, the present consumer complaint stands dismissed for non prosecution by the Complainant. No order as to cost.

This case is disposed of accordingly.

The Judgment be uploaded on the www.confonet.nic.in for the perusal of the parties.

A certified copy of this Judgment be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The file is to be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

 

 

Pronounced on 09.12.2024.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.