BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ATHYDERABAD.
F.A. 1198/2008 against C.C. 65/2007, Dist. Forum,Nellore
Between:
TTK Health Care Services Pvt. Ltd.,
47-14-10, 4thVidishaTowers
Dwarakanagar Main Road
Visakapatnam-16.
Rep. by its Head Office
TTK Health Care Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Jeevan Bhima Nagar
Bangalore
Rep. by its Company Secretary
And
1. Y. Lalithamma,
W/o. Srinivasulu Reddy
D.No. 12-301,
Sullurupet, Nellore Dist.
2. M/s. United
Branch Office : Sullurpet
Nellore Dist.
Counsel for the Appellant: Bangalore.
Counsel for the Resps:
Mr. E. Venugopal Reddy (R2)
QUORUM:
&
FRIDAY, THIS THE SEVENTEENTH
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
MIOTHospital, Chennai for her left knee replacement.
As per the terms of the policies, the appellant has to process the claim of the complainant and settle the claim, and recover from it.. It would reimburse the amounts paid by the appellant Therefore, it prayed for dismissal of the complaint.
Opposite Party No. 1
Therefore, it prayed that the appeal be allowed.
Earlier it was for an amount of Rs. 1 lakh. under Exs. A1 & A2 claiming the amount towards The affidavit of the officer was not filed.
It is easy for any person to take such a plea without substantiating the same. On the other hand it accuses the insurance company by stating that Except alleging that the repudiation of claim by it was justified, and not in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy, it did not expatiate the exact condition or term under which it could repudiate.
Learned counsel for the appellant contended that and we do not find any term to that effect. nd is eligible for the same. ndopposite party to its policy holders including the complainant.
It is not as though
In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs computed at Rs. 2,000/-. Time for compliance four weeks.
