BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.

F.A. 1299/2008 against C.C. 15/2008 , 

Between:

P. Kanakabhushanam                  

S/o. Late 

Age: 81 years, R/o. 6-2-151

Sri Sairam Street, Tirupathi  

                                                                  1) 

W/o. S. Bhima Rao

Age: 59 years,

Flat Owner No. 202

Srirdevi Apartments

Kanakabhushanam Layout

Opp. PadmavathiTudaPark

Tirupathi. 

2) 

W/o. K. Madhavamuni Rao

Age: 48 years, Research Asst.

Flat Owner No. 303

Srirdevi Apartments

Kanakabhushanam Layout

Opp. PadmavathiTudaPark

Tirupathi.                                     3) 

Builder, S/o. Late 

Age: 58 years, Flat No. 410

R/o. 19-9-10, Kennedy Nagar                             Tiruchanur Road, Tirupathi. 

4) 

Tirupathi Municipal Corporation

Tirupathi.

5) 

TUDA, Tirupathi.                                               

Counsel for the 

Counsel for the 

CORAM:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.

                                                                                    FRIDAY, THIS THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN

ORAL ORDER: 

***

1)               Tirupathi Municipal Corporation and the Vice-Chairman, TUDA, Tirupathi, Ops 3 & 4  in the stilt floor by taking necessary action   and further refund  

2)                

3)                       thth                which includes                     

4)       

5)                        th  th     

6)                  he alleged that    before the         16.2.1999 wherein stilt floor was shown as parking area.      

7)                   

8)                

9)                    Tirupathi Municipal Corporation and the Vice-Chairman, TUDA, Tirupathi, Ops 3 & 4   in the stilt floor by taking necessary action    and further refund  

10)                       

11)             

                                         Whether the directions issued against R3 & R4 to remove two rooms in the stilt floor is bad under law?

                                       Whether the appellant had to get the occupant of flat No. 201 vacated?

                                    Whether the appellant along with R1 to refund Rs. 68,000/- together with interest @ 9% p.a., from the date of complaint?

                                      Whether the complainants are entitled to compensation and costs as awarded by the Dist. Forum?

12)                 th   thth      

13)                                                  nd   nd 

The complainants intend to state that despite injunction the appellant, owner had raised two rooms in the stilt floor.   

14)        jurisdiction       Corporation reported in (2007) 4 SCC 579 held :

“It has been held in numerous cases of this Court that the jurisdiction of a consumer forum has to be construed liberally so as to bring many cases under it for their speedy disposal. In the case ofSpringMeadowsHospital

15)                       

16)                             the premises.  

17)             th              there is no         

18)     st    st th  st           

19)                  

20)                        

1)PRESIDENT 

2)      MEMBER                                                                            

*pnr

“UP LOAD – O.K.”