Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1687/08

M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MRS.K.KANAKALATHA - Opp.Party(s)

MR.RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA

27 Jan 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1687/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Nellore)
 
1. M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.
THE SENIOR DM, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, IX, 206 AND 207 2ND FLOOR, SAPTAGIRI TOWERS BEGUMPET, HYD-16.
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.

 

F.A.Nellore. 

Between:

 

The Senior Divisional Manager

United India Insurance Company Ltd.

Divisional Office IX, 206 & 207

2ndSaptagiriTowers

Begumpet, Hyderbad.                                                          K. Kankalatha

W/o. D. Sathyanath

House Wife, Age: 65 years

24/2-700, Saraswathi Nagar

Dargamitta,Nellore.                                                                           

Counsel for the Appellant :                        Ravi

Counsel for the Respondent:

 

CORAM:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.

                                                                                        

 

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN

 

ORAL ORDER:

 

***

 

1)   

2)                          Coimbatorewho opined that she was having Osteoarthritis problem.      

 

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease which takes a minimum period of at least five years to develop  Assailing repudiation   

 

3)                 Coimbatore   “Filariasis in her left leg which existed prior to the issuance of policy.’                 

 

4)      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5)             Accordingly   together with costs of Rs. 2,000/-. 

 

6)               

 

7)      

 

8)                 Coimbatore.           

         

 

9)           

 

45.        

 

Provided that nothing in this section shall prevent the insurer from calling for proof of age at any time if he is entitled to do so, and no policy shall be deemed to be called in question merely because the terms of the policy are adjusted on subsequent proof that the age of the life insured was incorrectly stated in the proposal.’”

 

 

Therefore the insurance company      

 

 

10)              

 

“Pre-existing condition means any injury which existed prior to the effective            

 

The insurance company intends to state that Osteoarthritis would not occur within two or three years.        

 

 

 

leg suppression of vital information.           Coimbatore       When the insurance company by virtue of             

 

11)             India said that there were three conditions for the 

 

“(a)   

 (b)   

 (c ) the policy holder must have known at the time of making the statement that it was false or that it suppressed facts which it was material to disclose.”

 

 

 

 

 

Therefore                  

 

12)               

 

 

         

1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)      MEMBER    

*pnr

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“UP LOAD – O.K”

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.