Chandigarh

StateCommission

A/262/2015

Indian Railway - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mrs. Manjula - Opp.Party(s)

S.S.Rana, Adv.

12 Feb 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

 

Appeal No.	:	262 of 2015
Date of Institution	:	14.10.2015
Date of Decision	:	12.02.2016

 

Indian Railways, through Amarjit Singh Sharma, SSE, C & W, of Northern Railway at Chandigarh.

.…Appellant/Opposite Party No.2.

Versus

1]     Mrs. Manjula resident of House No.1086, Sector 26, Panchkula.

….Respondent/Complainant.

2]     LIC of India, Jeevan Deep Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

3]     Union of India, through Indian Railways, under General Manager Personnal, Diesel Locomotive Work, Varanasi.

…..Respondents/Opposite Parties No.1 & 3.

 

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Argued by:

 

Sh. S. S. Rana, Advocate for the appellant.

Smt. Manjula, respondent No.1 in person.

Sh. Vinod Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Sh. Sunil K. Sahore, Advocate for respondent No.3.

 

BEFORE:   JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT.

                SH. DEV RAJ, MEMBER.

                SMT. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER.

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

            Vide our detailed order of the even date, recorded separately Appeal No.253 of 2015 titled as ‘Manjula Vs. LIC of India & Ors.’, has been accepted and the impugned order passed by the Forum has been modified.

2.         In view of acceptance of Appeal No.253 of 2015, this Appeal filed by Opposite Party No.2 – Northern Railways bearing No.262 of 2015 has been dismissed with no order as to costs.

3.         Certified copy of the main order, passed in Appeal No.253 of 2015 titled as ‘Manjula Vs. LIC of India & Ors.’, be placed on this file also.

4.         Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge.

Pronounced.

February 12, 2016.

[JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

 

(DEV RAJ)

MEMBER 

 

 

 

(PADMA PANDEY)

      MEMBER