Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1120/08

M/S LIFE INSURANCE CORP.OF INDIA - Complainant(s)

Versus

MRS. M. VIJAYA LAXMI - Opp.Party(s)

SRI.N.MOHAN KRISHNA

19 Jan 2010

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1120/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Nellore)
 
1. M/S LIFE INSURANCE CORP.OF INDIA
REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA, NELLORE.
Andhra Pradesh
2. MS LIC OF INDIA
REP.BY ITS SENIOR DM.
NELLORE
ANDHRA PRADESH
3. REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN
CENTRAL OFFICE, MUMBAI-21.
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MRS. M. VIJAYA LAXMI
R/O 23/855, RAMESH REDDY NAGAR, NELLORE-524 001.
Andhra Pradesh
2. MR.M.HARISHCHANDRA SATISH GOWD
R/O 23/855, RAMESH REDDY NAGAR, NELLORE-524 001.
NELLORE
ANDHRA PRADESH
3. MR. M. BHANU PRAKASH
SAME ADDRESS
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
  1. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : ATHYDERABAD

 

 

FA

 District Forum,Nellore

 

 

Between:

 

1.                 The Life Insurance Corporation ofIndia

Rep. by its Branch Manager, LIC ofIndia

Nellore.

 

2.                 The Life Insurance Corporation ofIndia

Rep. by its Senior Divisional Manger

LIC ofIndia,Nellore.

 

3.                 The Life Insurance Corporation ofIndia

Rep. by its Chairman, LIC ofIndia,

Central Office, Mumbai – 21.                  

 

And

 

1.                 M. Vijaya Laxmi, W/o Late Mukku Bhaskasra Rao

 

2.                 M. Harishchandra Satish Gowd

 

S/o Late M. Bhaskara Rao

 

3.                 M. Bhanu Prakash, S/o late m. Bhaskara Rao

All R/o 23/855, Ramesh Reddy Nagar

Nellore                       

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant  

 

Counsel for the  

R3

M/s. P. Veerraju for R2.

 

 

CORAM    

                                           

 

                                                            

Sri Syed Abdullah  

 

                                                                                                   

 Tuesday, the Nineteenth Day of January,Two Thousand Ten

 

 

Oral order :  

 

                                               This    

 

 In nutshell, the complainants are the legal heirs of the deceased policy holder Bhaskara Rao who had taken two polices for   

 

OP 1 filed the counter denying the factual aspects and justified its stand in repudiating the claim on the ground that since the contract is a     ththNelloreGovt.HospitalNellore   

 

During the enquiry the complainant had filed Evidence affidavit along with Ex. A1 to A11 so also

 

After going through the evidence on record the District Forum held that the OP had filed Xerox 

 

The District Forum made observation        

The citations referred to by the appellants/ the Ops reported in LIC of India Vs. M. Sunita 2005 (5) ALT 56 C:PA, (2) LIC ofIndia  

 

The undisputed facts are that the husband of the first              th     GovernmentHospital  ApolloHospital,HyderabadJakkaSujathamaHospital,Nellore   in respect of the documents.  Apex Court       CPRNC   

 

in the result, the appeal is allowed setting side the order dated  

 

 

                                                                                    

                                                                                    

                       

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.