Petitioner was the opposite party before the District Forum.

          Respondent had taken a telephone connection bearing No.9835160379 on prepaid connection basis.  Respondent’s mobile was disconnected in the year 2002 and finally, terminated on 16.5.2004 without refunding sum of Rs.7,000/- which was deposited by the respondent on account of over subscription by her.  Aggrieved by this, respondent filed a complaint before the District Forum.

-2-

          District Forum vide its order dated 31.1.2006 allowed the complaint and directed the petitioner to refund sum of Rs.7,000/- in addition to the sum of Rs.3,000/- by way of compensation and Rs.2,000/- by way of costs.

          Aggrieved by this, petitioner filed an appeal before the State Commission.  The State Commission upheld the majority view.

          Counsel for the petitioner states that since Subscriber Enrollment Form – SMART has neither been signed by the respondent nor by the petitioner, the same does not create a binding contract between the parties.  In view of this, she prays that she does not press the revision petition provided the order of the State Commission is not taken as a precedent for future reference.            Counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same.

          The Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed.   

          Order of the State Commission be not taken as a precedent for future reference. 

-3-

            Petitioner is granted four weeks’ time to comply with the order.