Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/49/2020

A.Ramkumar, Son of D.Annamalai, Proprietor Kumar Builders, 25/20, Karpaga Vinayagar Koil Street, Ekkattuthangal, Chennai 600 097. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mrs. Devikrishnan Alias, Dowmuny Day Doraisamy, Kadapakkam, Alambarai Village, Edaikkazhinadu Town, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. V.V.Giridhar

18 Nov 2020

ORDER

 

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru.Dr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN            ..   PRESIDENT

                          Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                          ..    MEMBER

FA.No. 49/2020

[As against the order in CC.No.235/2011 dated 04.08.2017 on the file of DCDRF, Chennai (South)]

DATED THE 18th   DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020

 

A.Ramkumar

S/o D. Annamalai

Proprietor Kumar Builders

25/20, Karpaga Vinayagar Koil Street

Ekkattuthangal, Chennai – 600 097..                                                       ..Appellant/  Oppoiste party

Vs.

Mrs. Devikrishnan Alias

Dowmuny Day Doraisamy

Kadapakkam, Alambarai Village

Edaikkazhinadu Town, Cheyyur Taluk

Kanchipuram District.                                                                                 ..Respondent/Complainant

 

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party     :      M/s. V.V. Giridhar

Counsel for Respondent / Complainant     :      M/s. K.Ganesan

 

          This FA coming up before us for final hearing on 18.11.2020  and  this Commission made the following:-                                                 

Docket order

 

              The above appeal is filed by the Appellant along with a petition in CMP.No.329/2019  for condoning the delay of 633 days. This Hon’ble Commission by its order dated 07.01.2020 made in CMP.No.329/2019  had directed the petitioner/appellant  to pay a cost of Rs.10,000 to the Respondent/Complainant.  The Respondent refused  to receive the said cost imposed by the Hon’ble Commission.

            Therefore vide order dated 10.02.2020, the petitioner was directed to deposit the cost of Rs.10,000/- to the Legal aid account of the SCDRC.  Pursuance of the order the petitioner has deposited cost of Rs.10,000  infavour of the Registrar  SCDRC, Chennai. Consequently the delay was condoned and the petition was allowed as per the order dated 13.02.2020 and the Registry was  directed to number the FASr  as FA.49/2020.

              The Respondent/Complainant  in the above CMP having not agreed to the order passed  in  CMP.No.329/2019 has preferred RP.No.384/2020 before the Hon’ble National Consumers Disputes  Redressal Commision.  Subsequently the Hon’ble National Commission by its order dated 17.09.2020 has allowed the above RP filed by the Revisioner Petitioner / Respondent therein  and had set aside the order in CMP.No.329/2019 dated 07.01.2020. 

             In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble National Consumers Disputes  Redressal Commision in RP.No.384/2020 dated 17.09.2020  this appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. 

 

     Sd/-                                                                                                                      Sd/-

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                        S.TAMILVANAN    

MEMBER                                                                                                       PRESIDENT

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.