Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

RP/20/2022

The managing Director, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mrs. Alice Prema Andrews, And another - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. M.Soudar Vijay Arilram,

15 Sep 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI.

 

Present: Hon’ble Thiru Justice R.SUBBIAH  ... PRESIDENT

             Thiru.R VENKATESAPERUMAL         … MEMBER

 

Revision Petition No.20 of 2022

(Against the Order dated 31.05.2022, passed in C.C No.127/2021 on the file of  the DCDRC, Chennai-South)

                                                    

                                                     Orders, dated:15.09.2022

The Managing Director,

Vecura Wellness Clinic,

Ground & First Floor,

Old No.52, New No.8,

Dr. B.N. Road, North Boag Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.   ... Revision Petitioner/1^st Opposite Party.

vs.

 

1. Mrs. Alice Prema Andrew,

A 601, Kavita Nivas,

No.46, Pachaiyapas College Hostel Road,

Chetpet,

Chennai – 600 031. ... 1^st Revision Respondent/Complainant.

 

2. The Chief Executive Officer,

M/s. Bajaj Finserve,

3^rd Floor, Kaba Plaza,

L.B. Road,

Indra Nagar,

Adyar,

Chennai – 600 020.

                       ... 2^nd Revision Respondent/2^nd Opposite party.

 

For Rev. Petitioners / 1^st Opposite party : M/s. M. Soundar 

                                                                Vijay Arulram

1^st Revision Respondent/Complainant   : Party-in-person

 

     This Revision Petition is listed today and, after hearing the arguments of the counsels for the parties and upon perusing the materials on record, this Commission passes the following:-

 

O R D E R

R.Subbiah, J. – President.   (Open Court)

 

                    

             This Revision Petition is filed against the Order, dated 31.05.2022, passed by the DCDRC, Chennai (South), in C.C. No.127/2021, whereby, the District Commission has set the Revision Petitioner herein/1^st  Opposite Party exparte for non-filing of written version for 207 days and consequently, adjourned the Case to 20.06.2022 for filing proof affidavit of the complainant.

             2. Heard the submissions of the counsels appearing for the parties. 

              The revision petition has been filed by the 1^st OP as against the order dt.31.05.2022 passed by the DCDRC, Chennai (South) setting the revision petitioner/1^st opposite party herein exparte in C.C. No.127/2021 for non-filing of written version for 207 days.  But the complaint has not reached any finality till date. Heard the submissions made by the 1^st Revision Respondent / complainant.   However, considering the delay of 207 days in filing the written version of the Revision Petitioner/ 1^st Opposite party, we thought it just and proper to allow the revision on condition that the Revision Petitioner/ 1^st Opposite party shall pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as costs to the 1^st Revision respondent / Complainant in person.  Now, the said condition is complied with, since the amount is paid across the Bar.

     3. In the result, the Revision Petition is allowed and the impugned order, dated 31.05.2022, passed in C.C. No.127/2021 by the DCDRC, Chennai (South), in setting the Revision Petitioner/1^st OP exparte is set aside, and the 1^st OP shall file their Version, Proof Affidavit and the documents/exhibits on their side, if any, in C.C. No.127/2021 on the next date of hearing without fail, whereupon, the District Commission shall proceed with the case in accordance with law, for its early disposal.

 

 

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                             R.SUBBIAH, J.

MEMBER                                                     PRESIDENT.

 

 

 

 

 

ISM/TNSCDRC/Chennai/Orders/SEPTEMBER/2022.