| Miscellaneous Application No. MA/12/403 |
| | | | 1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited | | Office No 2 Oriental House, 7th Floor, 7 Jamshedji Tata Road, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400020 | | Mumbai | | Maharashtra | | 2. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD | | MUMBAI CITY DIV OFFICE NO 4, MAGNET HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, NAROTTAM MARARJEET MARG BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI - 400001 |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Mr. Anil Rajgarhia | | Office at- 407, 4th Floor, Arun Chambers, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-40034 | | Mumbai | | Maharashtra | | 2. RAKSHA TPA PVT.LTD. | | 7,KUMTHA STREET,OFF MINT TOAD,BALLARD ESTATE,MUMBAI-400 001 |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
| | Miscellaneous Application No. MA/12/404 |
| | | | 1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited | | Office No 2 Oriental House, 7th Floor, 7 Jamshedji Tata Road, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400020 | | Mumbai | | Maharashtra | | 2. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD | | MUMBAI CITY DIV OFFICE NO 4, MAGNET HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, NAROTTAM MARARJEET MARG BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI - 400001 | | MUMBAI | | MAHARASHTRA |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Mrs Sarika A. Rajgarhia | | Office at- 407, 4th Floor, Arun Chambers, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-40034 | | Mumbai | | Maharashtra | | 2. RAKSHA TPA PVTT.LTD. | | 7,KUMTHA STREET,OFF MINT ROAD,BALLARD ESTATE,MUMBAI-400 001 |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
|
|
| ORDER | Common oral order in MA/12/403 in FA/12/1100 + MA/12/404 in FA/12/1101 Heard Adv. Smt. Sapna Bhuptany on behalf of the Applicant/Appellant, in both these matters. [2] These application for condonation of alleged delay on 281 days on the part of the Applicant/Appellant to prefer an appeal against the order passed by the South Mumbai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum. Non-Applicants/Respondents were duly served with notice of application for condonation of delay. However, the Non-Applicants/Respondents did not care to appear before this Commission to contest the application for condonation of delay and, therefore, it is presumed that the ground put forth in the application for condonation of delay are true. Hence, for the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay, these applications need to be allowed. Hence, the following order:- ORDER Miscellaneous Application No.403 of 2012 seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal No.1100 of 2012 as well as Miscellaneous Application No.404 of 2012 seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal No.1101 of 2012 are hereby allowed. Consequently, the delay in filing both these appeal stands condoned. No order as to costs. Pronounced and dictated on 24th December, 2013 | |
