Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/151/2022

BABU M JACOB - Complainant(s)

Versus

MRA SIGNATURE BAKERY - Opp.Party(s)

22 Sep 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/151/2022
( Date of Filing : 22 Apr 2022 )
 
1. BABU M JACOB
MANNAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VENDUVAZHY KARUKADOM POST, KOTHAMANGALAM
ERNAKULAM
KERALA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MRA SIGNATURE BAKERY
MRA SIGNATURE BAKERY THIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 151/2022 Filed on 25/04/2022

ORDER DATED: 22/09/2022

 

Complainant

:

Babu.M.Jacob, Mannaparambil House, Venduvazhy, Karukadom Post, Kothamangalam – 686 691.

                    (Party in person)

Opposite party

:

MRA Signature Bakery, Thirumala, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 006.

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party.  The opposite party entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegation raised by the complainant.  When the case came up for consideration today the complainant was present and the opposite party was represented.  Both parties submitted that the dispute between the parties were amicably settled out of Court and the complainant is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.  The complainant also made an endorsement on the complaint that he is not pressing the complaint.  In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceedings, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.

In the result complaint is dismissed as settled.  There will be no order as to cost.       

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 22th day of September,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.