Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1598/08

M/S HDFC BANK REP.BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, N.PRATAP - Complainant(s)

Versus

MR.T.V.SIVARAM DASS - Opp.Party(s)

MR.J.LOKESH REDDY

18 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1598/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Chittoor-II at triputi)
 
1. M/S HDFC BANK REP.BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, N.PRATAP
THE BRANCH MANAGER, MOSQUE RD, TIRUPATI, REG.OFF.AT RANIGUNJ, SEC-BAD.
SECUNDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR.T.V.SIVARAM DASS
C/O VENKATESWARA REDDY, 6-3-175/A, MANCHALA STREET, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST.
TIRUPATI
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1598/2008 against C.C.      

 

Between:

 

The Branch Manager

HDFC Bank,Mosque Road

Tirupathi

Rep. by its Authorised Signatory                                                                                                              

And

T. V. Sivaram Dass

S/o. T. Ramachandra Reddy

C/o. 6-3-175/A,Manchala Street

Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist.Complainant

 

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Respondent:                              

CORAM:

                       

                                     

                                                                                                       

 

 

FRIDAY,

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

 

1)        

 

2)           th         the bank had wrongly shown                        

 

3)                                  

 

 

4)       

 

5)            Since it did not furnish loan agreement    9,279/- 

 

6)                         

 

7)      

 

 

8)            at Rs. 2,500/-.

 

 

 

 

9)                    

 

10)        

 

11)                  assuming without admitting that the same is true could not be held as deficiency in service and direct on the ground that he has sustained loss of this amount    Evidently he did not make payment of loan instalments.                 

 

 

 

12)        

 

 

                                                                            1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)   MEMBER 

 

 

 

3)      MEMBER 

                                                                              *pnr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“UP LOAD – O.K.”

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member
 
[HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.