BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.
F.A. No. 1177/2008 against C.C. 79/2007,Hyderabad
Between:
M/s. R.C.I. India Pvt. Ltd.,
PineValley, First Level
Embassy Golf Links
Business Parks
OffIntermediate Ring Road
Bangalore-560 001.
1. Suresh RajS/o. Lae Raj Pershad
Age: 63 years
2. Smt. Hriday Mohini
W/o. R. Suresh Raj
Age: 63 years
Both are Residents of
Flat No. E/G-1,
Baser Apartments
6-3-628/5, Ravindra Nagar
Khairatabad
Hyderabad-500 004. 3. M/s. Gemawat Resorts Ltd.
Rep. by its Managing Director
At 164-Y,13 Main Road
3rd
Bangalore-560 010.
Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondents:
QUORUM:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.
FRIDAY, THIS THE
ORAL ORDER:
***
only in affiliated resorts as per the terms and conditions laid down in the agreement. entered The availing of
Admittedly when complainants paid the fee and other amounts the payment were 31 October, 2010. 31 October, 2010.
Bangalore. network.
Bangalore
The appellant contended that it has disaffiliated Bangalore Bangalore The exact words used were “We have therefore decided that The Village is being disaffiliated from our exchange programme.”
Bangalore.
Learned counsel for the appellant contend that the appellant was not a party to the agreement between them and opposite party No. 1.
Learned counsel for the appellant further contended that
Ex. B1 is the Spain
In the light of Ex. B1 together with other documents, we are of the opinion that the appellant had to provide the facilities. Importantly, the appellant did not file the agreement executed between it and opposite party No. 1 to know whether there was any principal and agent relationship between them.
