Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/225/2018

A.John Victor - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr.Sunil Nair, The Editor, Times of India - Opp.Party(s)

M/S.Ram Moorthy

28 Oct 2022

ORDER

                                           

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI (NORTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

 

PRESENT : THIRU G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L.,                          : PRESIDENT

                                  TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E.                          : MEMBER-I

                                  THIRU V. RAMAMURTHY, B.A., B.L., PGDLA : MEMBER-II

                      

FRIDAY THE 28^TH  DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

C.C.NO.225/2018

Mr.AT.John Victor,

Advocate, High Court of Madras,

No.AD 3/1, 2^nd Avenue,

Opp.St.Luke’s Church,

Anna Nagar,

Chennai-600 040.                                                                  …..Complainant

 ..Vs..

1.  Mr. Sunnil Naiyer,

The Editor-The Times of India,

123, Chamiers Road,

Nandnam, Chennai-600 035.

 

2.  The Circulation Manager,

The Times of India,

123, Chamiers Road,

Nandnam, Chennai-600 035.

 

3.  Mr.Lakshminarayanan,

M/s.Bennet Coleman & Co Ltd.,

140, Old Mahapalipurm Road,

Chemmenchery, Chennai-600 119.

                                                                                      ….Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for Complainant                        : M/s. Ramana Moorthy

Counsel for Opposite parties                  : M/s.Vijayaragavan

ORDER

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,

          This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

          The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite parties to pay a  sum of Rs.500000/-  towards damages as total compensation due to the negligent acts and willful acts and causing mental and untold agony, pain, suffering & hardships and torture and failing to address the actual problem and to delivery English news paper i.e. Times of India at the door step of the complainant and costs.

           Complainant absent.  No representation.  Complainant counsel absent.  Sufficient time given.  Complainant has not interest.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default.

 Order Pronounced dated 28^th  October  2022.

MEMBER – I                         MEMBER – II                                          PRESIDENT