Telangana

StateCommission

EA/182/2017

M/s. Hill County Properties Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr.Rajeswar V. Surabhi - Opp.Party(s)

K. Vishweswara Reddy

06 Apr 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Execution Application No. EA/182/2017
( Date of Filing : 23 Oct 2017 )
In
CC 244/2013
 
1. M/s. Hill County Properties Ltd.,
Rep by its Authorized Signatory, Neerav Kapasi, S/o Late Yashwant Kapasi, O/o Hill County, Bachupally, Hyderabad 500090
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Mr.Rajeswar V. Surabhi
S/o S. Tirupathi Rao aged 43 years, Occ. Pvt Employee, R/o 42890, Conquest Circle, Ashburn. VA 20148, USA Rep by his GPA Holder Mr. B. Purushotham Rao, S/o B. Venkat Rao aged 70 years, Occ. Retd, Empl
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. K. Ramesh JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 06 Apr 2018
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

 

   E.A.No. 182/2017

             In

C.C.No.244/2013

 

Between:

M/s.Hill County Properties Ltd.,

(Formerly Maytas Properties Ltd.)

Rep. by its Authorized Signatory

Neerav Kapasi, S/o.Late Yashwant Kapasi,

O/o.Hill County, Bachupally, Hyderabad – 500 090.

 

                                                                      …. Petitioner/OP.No.1

          And

Mr.Rajeshwar V.Surabhi

S/o.S.Thirupathi Rao, aged 43 years,

Occ: Private Employee,

R/o.42890, Conquest Circle, Ashburn

VA-20148, USA.

 

Represented by his GPA Holder Mr.B.Purushotham Rao,

S/o.B.Venkat Rao, aged 70 years, Occ: Retired Employee,

Flat No.403, Nirmal Towers,

Anand Nagar, Bowenpally, Secunderabad.

                   ….. Respondent/Complainant

    

Counsel for the  Petitioner/OP.No.1  : M/s.K.Vishweswara Reddy

 

Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant  : Notice served

 

QUORUM: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA, PRESIDENT

And

SRI PATIL VITHAL RAO,  MEMBER.

 

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL,

          TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN.

 

Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri. B.N.Rao Nalla, President).

 

***

 

     Counsel for Appellant present. No representation for Respondent. It is informed that the Joint Compromise Memo is filed in section on 28.03.2018 stating that both parties have amicably settled the matter and sought permission to withdraw the E.A. On verification of record, it is found that the joint memo is very much on record.

     In view of the same, the E.A. is terminated as withdrawn.

                         

 

PRESIDENT              MEMBER

             Dt.06.04.2018

    

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. K. Ramesh]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.