Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/51/2019

M/s. United India Insurance Co Ltd., Rep by its Branch Manager, Coimbatore 641 018, Tamil Nadu. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr.R.K. Perumal, S/o. Kethagounder, Dindigul (DT) 624 802, Tamilnadu. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. C. Paranthaman,

30 Mar 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.51/2019

 

(Against the Order dt.06.08.2018 made in C.C. No.132/2017 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore)

DATED THE 30^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023

 

M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Represented by its Branch Manager,

New No.768, Old No.1028,

United India Building, Avinashi Road,

Near Dinathanthi Office,

Coimbatore – 641 018.                                                    .. Appellant / Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

Mr. R.K. Perumal,

S/o. Mr. Kethagounder,

No.1/1/68, Anna Nagar,

Vedasandur,

Vadamadurai (TK),

Dindigul (DT) – 624 802.                                                .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party             : M/s. C. Paranthaman

Counsel for Respondent / Complainant           : M/s. K. Ramasamy

                 

This appeal coming up before us on 30.03.2023 for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of respondent and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:        

                                                                                                                                                                               

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of the respondent and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT