IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                       BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                          Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                            ::      MEMBER

CC. No. 106/2015

     DATED THE 17^TH  DAY OF AUGUST 2021

1.Mr.C.Rengaraju,

S/o Late V.Chellappa,

A-6, Plot No.116, Achla Vihar,

8^th Main Road,

2^nd street, A1 Block,

Anna Nagar,

Chennai 600 040  

2. Mrs.R.Hemalatha

W/o C.Rangaraju,

A-6, Plot No.116, Achla Vihar,

8^th Main Road,

2^nd street, A1 Block,

Anna Nagar,

Chennai 600 040                                                              ..Complainants

                                           Vs

1.Mr.R.Chandrasekaran

 S/o Late.S.Ramanatha Iyer,

No.4/10, 57^th street,

Ashok Nagar,

Chennai 600 083

2. Mrs. K.M.Manju Parkavi,

D/o M.K.Mathivanan,

Old No.15, New No.91,

East Jones Road,

Saidapet,

Chennai 600 015

3. Mr.K.K.Mani,

S/o Kannaiappan,

Power Agent of Mr.R.Chandrasekaran,

Muthukondapuram Village and post,

Tirutani Taluk,

Thiruvallur District – 631 204   

4. Mr.K.M.Vidyasagar,

S/ M.K.Mathivanan,

Power Agent of K.M.Manju Parkavi,

No.8, 1^st Avenue, Ashok Nagar,

Chennai 600 083  

5.  M/s Manju Foundations Pvt Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

Mr.K.M.Vidyasagar, 

No.8, Sapthaswara Apartment,

1^st Avenue, Ashok Nagar,

Chennai 600 083                                                                  ..Opposite parties

Counsel for Complainants             : M/s Pass Associates

For opposite parties 1 to 5           : Dr.S.Padma

   This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :                                                                  

                                                 Docket order

              No representation for Complainant. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for filing proof affidavit of complainant and for appropriate orders. When this matter was called at 11.00 A.M, there is no representation for the complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon. But the complainant was again not present, hence the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complainant had not taken any efforts to appear. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

            Sd/-                                                                                                                 Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                                PRESIDENT