BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD
F.A.No.398 OF 2009 AGAINST C.C.No.66 OF 2008 DISTRICT FORUM-IIIHYDERABAD
Between:
M/s Sai Gokul Constructions, Sri N Sharath, Plot No.44,
Park View Enclave, ManovikasnagarPO
Secunderabad
A N D
1. S/o N.Veeraswamy, aged about 31 years
Occ: Director Flat no.202, 3rdFloor
BabaTowersHyderabad
2. aged about 28 years
Flat No.103, 1stBabaTowers, Bakaram
Musheerabad,Hyderabad
3. aged about 27 years, Occ; IT Professional
Flat No.301, 4th Musheerabad, Hyderabad
4. W/o Sri H.Mahalinga Prasad, aged abut 36 yrs
Occ: Teacher Flat No.303, 4thBabaTowers
Bakaram, Musheerabad,Hyderabad
5. aged about 54 years, occ: Housewife
Flat No.101, 2ndBabaTowers, Bakaram
Musheerabad,Hyderabad
6. Aged about 38 years, Occ: Housewife
Flat No.003, (G-3), 1stBabaTowers
Bakaram, Musheerabad,Hyderabad
7. aged about 58 years, Occ: Service
Flat No.203, 3rdBabaTowers
Bakaram, Musheerabad,Hyderabad
8. S/o BGK Ratnam, aged about 52 years, Flat No.201
3rd Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad
9. Aged about 30 years, Occ: Employee,BabaTowers
Bakaram, Musheerabad,Hyderabad
10. W/o YVL Narasimha Rao, aged about 41 y ears
Occ: Service Flat No.302, 4thBabaTowers
Bakaram, Musheerabad,Hyderabad
11. PNEswar Prasad, Flat No.G-1, 1stTowers
Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad
12. stBabaTowers
Bakaram, Musheerabad,Hyderabad
Counsel for the Appellants
Counsel for the Respondents
QUORUM:
AND
SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)
1. `10,000/- towards compensation and`1,000/- towards costs to each of the respondents. `26,000/- for installation of the tap connection.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1) Whether there was cellar water seepage to the building?
2) Whether the respondents are entitled to the relief claimed for?
3) To what relief?
7.
8.
KMK*
