Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/105/2017

The Employees Provident Fund Organization - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr.M. Arumugham, & another - Opp.Party(s)

A.Gandhi & R.Dhanalakshmi

26 Nov 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.105 / 2017

(Against the order in C.C. No.390/2010, dated:24.03.2016 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (South))

                         DATED THE 26^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

 

1. The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization,

Regional Office,

Royapettah,

Chennai – 600 014.         

 

2. The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization,

Regional Office,

No.3, Rajaji Salai,

Tambaram,

Chennai – 600 045.                                                                                                   .. Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2.

-Versus-

1. Mr. M. Arumugham,

S/o. Mr. Murugesa Naicker,

No.1/191, Perumal Koil Street,

No.33, Navallur Village & Post,

Chengalpattu Taluk,

Kancheepuram District.                                                                                              .. 1^st Respondent / Complainant.

 

2. The Management of Natesan Precision Components (P) Ltd.,

No.9 B CMDA Industrial Area,

M N Nagar,

Sengunram Village,

Kanchipuram District - 603 204.                                                              … Given up in Appeal since no award passed.

.

 Counsel for the Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2 : M/s. K. Prabhakar

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent / Complainant          : M/s. Chandrasekar

2^nd Respondent                                                          : Given up

          This appeal coming up before us on 26.11.2021 for appearance of appellants, for filing written argument of appellants and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket order

No representation for Appellants & 1^st Respondent. This appeal is posted today for appearance of Appellants and for filing written arguments of appellants and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 10.45 A.M., the Appellants was not present hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.15 P.M., then also, the Appellants have not appeared.  Hence keeping the appeal  pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to costs.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                                                 Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                       R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                                         PRESIDENT