Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/383/09

M/S HDFC BANK, BRANCH MANAGER - Complainant(s)

Versus

MR.KRISTIPATI RAMA KRISHNA REDDY S/O NAGI REDDY - Opp.Party(s)

M/S J.LOKESH REDDY

21 Dec 2009

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/383/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Nalgonda)
 
1. M/S HDFC BANK, BRANCH MANAGER
VALLURI COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA.
VIJAYAWADA
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR.KRISTIPATI RAMA KRISHNA REDDY S/O NAGI REDDY
R/O NEAR SHIVANI SCHOOL, SHIVAJINAGAR, MIRYALAGUDA TOWN AND MANDAL,
NALGONDA
Andhra Pradesh
2. M/S HDFC BANK LTD.REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER(R2 NOT N.PARTY)
SAGAR ROAD, MIRYALGUDA,
NALGONDA
ANDHRA PRADESH
3. R.T.A (R3 NOT N.PARTY)
VIJAYAWADA,
KRISHNA
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
 
 

 

 

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD

 

FA 

Between:

 

The Branch Manager

HDFC Bank, Valluri Complex

3rd M.G. Road, Vijaywada

Rep. by its Authorised Signatory

N. Pratap, S/o. N. Padma Rao.

                                                                                                                 

                                                                  1) KrishnaS/o. Nagi Reddy, Age: 38 years

R/o. ShivaniSchool

Shivajinagar,MiryalagudaTown

Nalgonda Dist.                                                                                               2. 

Rep. by its Branch Manager

Sagar Road, Miryalguda                                                                                                                           

3. 

Krishna District.

(Resp. Nos. 2 & 3 are not

necessary parties to the appeal)                                                                                               

                                                                                               

Counsel for the Appellants:                       

Counsel for the Resp.

 

CORAM:

         

              

                                            

 

 

MONDAY THIS THE 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                                  

1)                    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2)                                           

 

3)                         

 

 

 

Later on 1.8.2008            

 

4)       Vijayawada              

 

5)          

 

6)         

 

 

 

 

7)                     and could not have ordered for return of the vehicle.      

 

8)      

 

i)                  Whether the bank was entitled to seize the vehicle on the complainant’s default 

 

ii)                Whether the order of 

 

iii)             To what relief?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9)          Vijayawada      possession was taken by exercising force.   appellant the complainant tried to develop the argument                       

         

 

 

“Essentially these are matters of contract and unless the party succeeds in showing that the contract is unconscionable or opposed to public policy the scope of interference in writ petitions in such contractual matters is practically non-existent. If agreements permit the financier to take possession of the financed vehicles, there is no legal impediment on such possession being taken.

 

10)              

 

51. Special provisions regarding motor vehicle subject to hire purchase agreement, etc.

 

(1) Where an application for registration of a motor vehicle which is held under a hire-purchase, lease or hypothecation agreement (hereafter in this section referred to as the said agreement) is made, the registering authority shall make an entry in the certificate of registration regarding the existence of the said agreement.

(2) Where the ownership of any motor vehicle registered under this Chapter is transferred and the transferee enters into the said agreement with any person, the1
[last registering authority] shall, on receipt of an application in such form as the Central Government may prescribe from the parties to the said agreement, make an entry as to the existence of the said agreement in the certificate of registration 2f and an intimation in this regard shall be sent to the original registering authority if the last registering authority is not the original registering authority].

 

 

 

 

(3) Any entry made under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), may be cancelled by the1[last registering authority] on proof of the termination of the said agreement by the parties concerned on an application being made in such form as the Central Government may prescribe2[and an intimation in this behalf shall be sent to the original registering authority if the last registering authority is not the original registering authority].

(4) No entry regarding the transfer of ownership of any motor vehicle which is held under the said agreement shall be made in the certificate of registration except with the written consent of the person whose name has been specified in the certificate of registration as the person with whom the registered owner has entered into the said agreement.

(5) Where the person whose name has been specified in the certificate of registration as the person with whom the registered owner has entered into the said agreement, satisfies the registering authority that he has taken possession of the vehicle3[from the registered owner] owing to the default of the registered owner under the provisions of the said agreement and that the registered owner refuses to deliver the certificate of registration or has absconded, such authority may, after giving the registered owner an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make (by sending to him a notice by registered post acknowledgment due at his address entered in the certificate of registration) and notwithstanding that the certificate of registration is not produced before it, cancel the certificate and issue a fresh certificate of registration in the name of the person with whom the registered owner has entered into the said agreement:

Provided that a fresh certificate of registration shall not be issued in respect of a motor vehicle, unless such person pays the prescribed fee:

Provided further that a fresh certificate of registration issued in respect of a motor vehicle, other than a transport vehicle, shall be valid only for the remaining period for which the certificate cancelled under this sub-section would have been in force.

(6) The registered owner shall, before applying to the appropriate authority, for the renewal of a permit under section 81 or for the issue of duplicate certificate of registration under sub-section (14) of section 41, or for the assignment of a new registration mark4[under section 47, or removal of the vehicle to another State, or at the time of conversion of the vehicle from one class to another, or for issue of no objection certificate under section 48, or for change of residence or place of business under section 49, or for the alteration of the vehicle under section 52, make an application] to the person with whom the registered owner has entered into the said agreement, (such person being hereafter in this section referred to as the financier) for the issue of a no objection certificate (hereafter in this section referred to as the certificate).

 

 


Explanation.-For the purposes of this sub-section and sub-sections (8) and (9), "appropriate authority" in relation to any permit, means the authority which is authorised by this Act to renew such permit and, in relation to registration means the authority which is authorised by this Act to issue duplicate certificate of registration or to assign a new registration mark.

(7) Within seven days of the receipt of an application under sub-section (6) the financier may issue, or refuse, for reasons which shall be recorded in writing communicate to the applicant, to issue, the certificate applied for, and where the financier fails to issue the certificate and also fails to communicate the reasons for refusal to issue the certificate to the applicant within the said period of seven days, the certificate applied for shall be deemed to have been issued by the financier.

(8) The registered owner shall, while applying to the appropriate authority for the renewal of any permit under section 81, or for the issue of a duplicate certificate of registration under sub-section (14) of section 41, or while applying for assignment of a new registration mark under section 47, submit with such application the certificate, if any, obtained under sub-section (7) or, where no such certificate has been obtained, the communication received from the financier under that sub-section, or, as the case may be, a declaration that he has not received any communication from the financier within the period of seven days specified in that sub-section.


11)       

 

Clause 14.2:   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i)                  without any notice and assigning any reason  

 

 

ii)                sell by auction   

 

 

Therefore           In the instant case it is nobody’s case that the seizure was 

 

12)               

         

 

 

 

 

 

13)       

 

 

1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)      MEMBER 

                                                         Dt.     *pnr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“UPLOAD – O.K.”

 
 
 
 
 
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.