BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ATHYDERABAD.
F.A. 295/2009 against C.C.
Between:
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Rep. by the Telecom District Manager
Ramnagar, Ongole
Prakasham Dist.
And
Dubbagunta Suresh Babu
S/o. Venkateshwarlu
Age: 31 years, Journalist
R/o. 4-299, Satyanarayanapuram
Ongole, Prakasham Dist.
Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Resp:
CORAM:
&
MONDAY, THIS THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble
1)
2) While so
The delivery boy has given a letter that though he had received it on 24.5.2008 and due to his own personal reasons he could deliver it on 27.5.2008.
3) thth he had to attend There is no cause of action for the complainant to file the complaint, and therefore prayed for dismissal of the complaint with costs.
4)
5) th
6)
7)
8) Immediately he took journey evidenced under bus ticket Ex. A4.
9) th or wrong delivery of the telegram, or delay, error or omissions in the transmission or delivery thereof.
“The Government shall not be responsible for any loss or damage which may occur in consequence of any telegraph officer failing in his duty with respect to the receipt, transmission or delivery of any message and no such officer shall be responsible for any such loss or damage, unless he causes the same
(emphasis supplied)
10)
“It is true that exemption is provided under the Indian Post Office Act th
In fact exemption which was referred to is not absolute.
11)
1)PRESIDENT
2) MEMBER
3) MEMBER
04/07/2011
*pnr
UP LOAD – O.K.
