West Bengal

Rajarhat

MA/19/2022

Smt. Bhakti Dutta W/o Late Paresh Chandra Dutta - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr.Badal Chandra Patra S/o Late Nishi Kanta Patra - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

15 Feb 2022

ORDER

Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/19/2022
( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2022 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/68/2021
 
1. Smt. Bhakti Dutta W/o Late Paresh Chandra Dutta
31, Subhas Nagar, Noa Para, P.S.-Baranagar, Kolkata-700090
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Mr.Badal Chandra Patra S/o Late Nishi Kanta Patra
Vill & P.O.-Uttar Sona Mui, P.S.-Tamluk, Dist.-Midnapur(E), Pin-721648
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 15 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

On 07.02.2022 the Ld. Counsel for the Complainant has filed an application stating that as the grievance of the Complainant have already been redressed out of the Court, the Complainant is not intending to proceed with this complaint. In support of his contention the Complainant has also field a photocopy of the sale deed, executed and register in his favour by the OP-1 in respect of the suit flat. According to the Complainant if this application is not allowed, he will suffer irreparable loss and injury and prayer is made by the Complainant for allowing this application.

We have carefully perused the content of the application filed by the Complainant on 07.02.2022. In our considered view as the dispute of the Complainant has been resolved by the OP-1 by way of amicable settlement out of Court and where the Complainant is not inclined to proceed with this complaint further, hence we no objection to the prayer of the Complainant. We have also noticed that during pendency of this complaint the OP-1 had executed and register the sale deed in favour of the Complainant in respect of the flat.

Going by the foregoing discussion hence it is ordered that the Consumer Complaint being no-CC/68/2021 is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. There is no order as to cost.

The MA being no-19/2022 is filed by the OP-2 challenging the maintainability of the consumer complaint being no-CC/68/2021.

As the Complainant has withdrawn the complaint on the ground that the OP-1 has settled the dispute by way of amicable settlement out of the Court, hence this MA-19/2022 has lost its force and consequently the MA-19/2022 is also hereby dismissed. There is no order as to cost.

 

Let plain copy of this judgment be given to the parties free of cost as per the CPR.

Dictated and corrected by

[HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder]
MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.