Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/248/2017

The Branch Manager, Central co-op Bank, Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr.B.Varatharajan - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.R.Ravichandran

13 Dec 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.248/2017

(Against the order in C.C. No.87/2014, dated:19.10.2016 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North)

                         DATED THE 13^th DAY OF DECEMBER  2021

 

 

1.The Branch Manager,

   Chennai Central Co-operative Bank Limited

   Rep. by its Branch Manager,

   Anna Nagar, 2^nd Avenue Branch

   Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600 040.

 

2.The General Manger,

   Chennai Central Co-operative Bank Limited

   Local Head Office

   No.215, Oppoiste to Loan Square

   Prakasam Salai, Broadway,

   Chennai – 600 108.                                                   .. Appellants / Opposite parties

-Vs-

 

1.Mr.B. Varadharajan

   S/o K.Balasubramanian

   Plot NO.2135, EWS, Vasantham Colony,

    Anna Nagar(West)

   Chennai – 600 040.

 

2.Mrs. V. Premkumari,

   W/o Mr.B.Varadharajan

   Plot NO.2135, New No.77

   1^st Street, EWS, Vasantham Colony,

   Anna Nagar(West), Chennai – 600 040.                    .. Respondents/ Complainants

 

Counsel for the Appellant                         : M/s. R.Ravichandran

Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2         : M/s. R.Dhanalakshmi

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 13.12.2021 for hearing. Due to non – representation of the Appellant, this Commission made the following order:                                                                                                

 

 

 

Docket order

 

            Respondents present. No representation for appellant.   This appeal is posted today for  filing written argument of both  & for arguments in list. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the appellant was not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.15 pm, then also the appellant has not appeared and written argument of appellant was also not filed. Hence keeping the appeal  pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence the appeal  is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

 

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                      Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT