Sowmya B.A. filed a consumer case on 27 Oct 2010 against Mr.Ashwath Babu B.L. in the Bangalore Urban Consumer Court. The case no is CC/10/2450 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
Karnataka
Bangalore Urban
CC/10/2450
Sowmya B.A. - Complainant(s)
Versus
Mr.Ashwath Babu B.L. - Opp.Party(s)
27 Oct 2010
ORDER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM (Principal)
D/o Mr. Anjeneya Setty,Aged About 23years Residing AtNo.2942,14thcross,K.R.Nagar Shasthri Nagar,Banashakri 2nd Stage Bangalore-70,
BEFORE:
PRESENT:
ORDER
COMPLAINTS FILED ON: 26.10.2010
DISPOSED ON: 28.01.2011
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AT BANGALORE (URBAN)
DATED THIS THE 28TH JANUARY 2011
PRESENT:- SRI. B.S. REDDYPRESIDENT
SMT. M. YASHODHAMMAMEMBER
SRI. A. MUNIYAPPAMEMBER
COMPLAINT Nos.2448, 2449, 2450, 2451, 2452,
2453, 2454, 2455, 2456 & 2457/2010
Complaint no.2448/10
Complainant
Mr. A. Kumar,
S/o Mr. C. Ashwathnarayana Rao,
Aged about 49 years,
R/at No.1060, 14thMain,
Srinagar,
Bangalore – 560 050.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2449/10
Complainant
Mr. Sanjeev Kulkarni,
S/o Mr. Shamrao D Kulkarni,
Aged about 39 years,
R/at No.311, “Sharath Nilaya”,
11thMain, Banashankari I Stage,
2nd Block,
Bangalore – 560 050.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2450/10
Complainant
Sowmya. B.A.,
D/o Mr. Anjeneya Setty,
Aged about 23 years,
R/at No.2942, 14th Cross,
K.R. Nagar, Shasthri Nagar,
Banashankari II Stage,
Bangalore – 560 070.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2451/10
Complainant
Mr. Nagaraj E.,
S/o Eraiah Shetty,
Aged about 42 years,
R/at No.6, Tulasi Nivas,
1st Cross, 2ndMain,
Navodaya Nagar, J.P.Nagar, 7th Phase,
Bangalore – 560 076.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2452/10
Complainant
Mr. Murari Veeresh Shetty,
S/o Mr. Murari Gururaja Shetty,
Aged about 42 years,
R/at No.6, Tulasi Nivas,
1st Cross, 2ndMain, Navodayanagar,
J.P. Nagar 7th Phase,
Bangalore – 560 076.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2453/10
Complainant
Mr. Hampesh T.,
S/o Mr. Tippeswamy M.H.,
Aged about 37 years,
R/at No.15,
Nadhyojatha 4th A Cross,
KHB Colony,
Basaveshawarnagar,
Bangalore – 560 079.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2454/10
Complainant
Mr. Somashekara T.S.,
S/o Mr. T.R. Srinivasaiah,
Aged about 42 years,
R/at No.29, Anugraha,
18thMain, Komarla Seeds Road,
Subramanyapura, Chikkalasandra,
Bangalore – 560 018.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2455/10
Complainant
Sanjeev Kumar. V.,
S/o M. Vasanth Rao,
Aged about 28 years,
R/at No.65/1, Opp: Water Tank,
Vijayanagar, NelamangalaTown,
Bangalore Rural District.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2456/10
Complainant
Mr. Sathyanarayana Shetty B.,
S/o Mr. Sannappa Shetty. Y.,
Aged about 45 years,
R/at No.24, Rukmani Stores,
II Main, Vittal Nagar,
Chamarajapet,
Bangalore – 560 018.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Complaint no.2457/10
Complainant
Mr. E. Manjunatha,
S/o Mr. Erappa Shetty,
Aged about 31 years,
R/at No.40, 4th Cross,
Lakshminagar,
Gururaghavendra Layout,
J.P. Nagar 7th Phase,
Bangalore – 560 078.
Rep: by P.A. Holder.
Chetan G.,
S/o Girish. H.,
Aged about 42 years,
No.1033, III Stage, III Block,
V Main, II E Cross,
Basaweshawaranagar,
Bangalore.
Advocate: Sri. K.R. Nagendra &
Others
V/s
OPPOSITE PARTY
Mr. Ashwath Babu B.L.,
Proprietor,
M/s Trishul Realty Holdings,
No.912, HandignalaVillage,
Keshawara Post,
Sidlaghatta Taluk,
Chikkaballapura – 562 102.
Also at No.10/18,
Chabriya Layout,
Kumara Krupa Road,
Bangalore – 560 001.
Ex-Parte
O R D E R
SRI. B.S.REDDY, PRESIDENT
The complainants filed these complaints U/s. 12 of the Consumer Protection Act of 1986, seeking direction to Opposite Party (herein after called as O.P) to refund the amounts paid towards advance sale consideration for purchase of plots in the residential layout; with interest at 18% p.a. along with damages of Rs.10,000/- with litigations costs, on the allegations of deficiency in service on the part of the OP.
OP is common in all these complaints, the questions involved and reliefs claimed are identical. In order to avoid the repetition of facts and multiplicity of reasonings, in the interest of justice all these complaints stand disposed of by this common order.
2.The case of the complainants to be stated in brief is that:
OP being a land developer entered into an agreement of sale with the complainants and the complainants agreed to purchase vacant plots proposed to be formed in the residential layout namely “THE SERENITY” situated at HandignalaVillage, Kasaba Hobli, Siddlaghatta Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. OP failed to fulfill his obligations; as the layout was not developed, the complainants approached the OP seeking refund of the advance amount paid OP issued cheques towards refund of the amounts and the said cheques were dishonoured as “Funds Insufficient”. The complainants caused legal notice, OP failed to reply for the same. It is stated that all these agreement deeds came into existence at Bangalore, hence this Forum has jurisdiction to entertain the complaints. The details of advance sale consideration and site numbers, agreement deeds are as mentioned in the below chart:
Sl. No.
Complaint
No.
Site No.
Date of Agreement
Amount Paid
1
2448/10
139
16.10.2009
Rs.1,04,701/-
2
2449/10
150
16.10.2009
Rs.50,000/-
3
2450/10
60
16.10.2009
Rs.1,00,000/-
4
2451/10
156
16.01.2009
Rs.2,00,000/-
5
2452/10
154
16.01.2009
Rs.1,64,000/-
6
2453/10
149
19.01.2009
Rs.1,00,000/-
7
2454/10
140
16.10.2009
Rs.50,001/-
8
2455/10
Rs.1,64,000/-
9
2456/10
38
16.10.2009
Rs.50,000/-
10
2457/10
151
16.01.2009
Rs.2,00,000/-
As OP failed to refund the amounts, the complainants felt deficiency in service on the part of the OP and were advised to lodge these complaints seeking necessary reliefs stated above.
3.The hand notices issued were duly served; as the notices are received by the authorized signatory of OP. OP failed to appear, inspite of service of notice. Hence placed ex-parte.
4.In order to substantiate the complaint averments, the respective complainants filed affidavit evidences. Arguments heard from complainants side.
5.Perused the complaint averments and affidavit evidence of the complainants and documents produced. OP as a developer made these complainants to part with huge amounts as shown in the above chart with an assurance of allotting the sites in the proposed layout to be formed. OP has executed agreement deeds incorporating the terms and conditions acknowledging receipt of advance sale consideration from these complainants. OP failed to develop any layout and allot the sites to the complainants. The complainants demanded for refund of the amounts paid, OP issued post dated cheques towards refund of the amounts, but when the cheques were presented the same were dishonoured as “Funds Insufficient”. For the legal notice OP has neither replied nor complied the demands, hence the complainants were made to approach this Forum seeking necessary reliefs. The very fact of OP remaining ex-parte goes to show that he is admitting all allegations made in the complaints. The act of OP in not forming the layout and allotting the sites or to refund the amounts received towards advance sale consideration; amounts to deficiency in service on his part. When the OP was not able to form the layout, it was fair enough on his part to refund the amounts when demanded by the complainants. The complainants are entitled for refund of the amounts with interest at 18% p.a. with litigation cost of Rs.1,000/-. Accordingly we proceed to pass the following:
O R D E R
The complaints filed by these complainants allowed in part.
1. In complaint No.2448/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.1,04,701/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
2. In complaint No.2449/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.50,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
3. In complaint No.2450/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
4. In complaint No.2451/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
5. In complaint No.2452/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.1,64,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
6. In complaint No.2453/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
7. In complaint No.2454/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.50,001/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
8. In complaint No.2455/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.1,64,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from 16.10.2009 till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
9. In complaint No.2456/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.50,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
10. In complaint No.2457/2010 OP is directed to refund an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of agreement till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- to the complainant.
OP to comply the order within four weeks from the date of this order.
This original order shall be kept in the file of the complaint No.2448/2010 and a copy of it shall be placed in other respective files.
Send the copy of this order to both the parties free of cost.
(Dictated to the Stenographer and typed in the computer and transcribed by him, verified and corrected, and then pronounced in the Open Court by us on this the 28th day of January – 2011.)
PRESIDENT
MEMBERMEMBER
Snm:
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.