Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/244/09

M/S MADAVI ENTERPRISES, SEEDS AND PESTICIDES - Complainant(s)

Versus

MR.ADDAGATLA SHANKARAIAH - Opp.Party(s)

M/S MANNE HARI BABU

13 Jul 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/243/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. SRI RAMA FERTILIZER AND DEPOT, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR
R/O 8-7-141, STATION ROAD, WARANGAL AND OTHERS.
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. MS SURYA SEEDS LIMITED GUNTUR
REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, D.NO.5-87-48, IST FLOOR, LAXMIPURAM,
GUNTUR
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR.VAINALA MOGILI S/O RAJALINGAM
R/O NARSINGAPUR VILLAGE, H/O ITIKALAPALLY, NARSAMPET MANDAL,
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
WARANGAL.
WARANGAL
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. FA/244/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. M/S MADAVI ENTERPRISES, SEEDS AND PESTICIDES
REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR, R/O OPP.HEAD POST OFFICE, WARANGAL.
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. MS SURYA SEEDS LIMITED GUNTUR
REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, D.NO.5-87-48, IST FLOOR, LAXMIPURAM,
GUNTUR
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR.ADDAGATLA SHANKARAIAH
R/O NARSINGAPUR VILLAGE, H/O ITIKALAPALLY, NARSAMPET MANDAL, WARANGAL DIST.
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
WARANGAL
WARANGAL
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. FA/245/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. M/S MAHESHWARA FERTILIZERS AND AGENCIES
REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR, R/O OPP.S.B.H.MAIN ROAD, NARASAMPET, WARANGAL DIST.
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. MS SURYA SEEDS LIMITED GUNTUR
REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, D.NO.5-87-48, IST FLOOR, LAXMIPURAM,
GUNTUR
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR.MOGULLA SARAIGH
R/O NARSINGAPUR VILLAGE, H/O ITIKALAPALLY, NARASAMPET MANDAL,
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
WARANGAL,
WARANGAL
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. FA/246/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. SRI RAJA RAJESHWARI FERTILIZERS DEPOT, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR
R/O NARSAMPET, WARANGAL DIST.
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. MS SURYA SEEDS LTD,GUNTUR
REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, D.NO.5-87-48, IST FLOOR, LAXMIPURAM,
GUNTUR
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR.KATI RAM REDDY S/O KANAKAIAH
R/O NARASINGAPUR VILL, H/O ITIKALAPALLY, NARASMPET MANDAL,
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
WARANGAL.
WARANGAL
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. FA/247/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. M/S PAVITRA SEEDS AND FERTILIZERS, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR
OPP.M.R.O. OFFICE, R/O NARASAMPET,
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. MS SURYA SEEDS LIMITED GUNTUR
REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, D.NO.5-87-48, IST FLOOR, LAXMIPURAM,
GUNTUR
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR.ERLA NARSIMHA RAMULU S/O SAMMAIAH
R/O NARSINGAPUR VILLAGE, H/O ITIKALAPALLY, NARASMPET MANDAL,
WARANGAL
Andhra Pradesh
2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
WARANGAL.
WARANGAL
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

FAWarangal 

Between:

 

1) 

Rep. by its Proprietor

R/o.Station Road

Warangal

 

2) 

Rep. by its Regional Manager

D.No. 5-87-48, 1stLaxmipuram

Guntur                                                                                                     And

1) 

Age: 32 years, Agriculture

R/o. Narasingapur (V)

H/o. Itikalapally, Narsampet (M)

Warangal Dist.                                                                                     2) 

Warangal Dist.                                                                                               

 

FA Warangal     

 

Between:

 

1) 

Rep. by its proprietor,

R/o.Opp:Head Post Office,Warangal

 

2) 

Rep. by its Regional Manager

D.No. 5-87-48, 1stLaxmipuram

Guntur                                                      ***                                                                                                                        

And

1) 

Age.40 yrs., Occu:Agriculture,

R/o.Narsingapur Village, H/o.Itikalapally,

Narsampet Mandal, Warangal Dist.

                                                                                                                  2) 

Warangal Dist.                                                                                               

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FA Warangal     

 

Between:

 

1) 

Rep. by its Proprietor,

R/o.Opp.S.B.H.Main Road,

Narasampet, Warangal Dist.

 

2) 

Rep. by its Regional Manager

D.No. 5-87-48, 1stLaxmipuram,

Guntur                                                      ***                                                                                                                        

And

 

1) 

 Age.60 yrs, Occ:Agriculture,

R/o.Narisngapur Village,

H/o.Itikalapally, Narasampet (M),

Warangal Dist.

 

                                                                                                                                                     2) 

Warangal Dist.                                                                                               

 

FA Warangal     

 

Between:

 

1) 

Rep. by its Proprietor, R/o.Narsampet,

Warangal Dist.

 

 

2) 

Rep. by its Regional Manager

D.No. 5-87-48, 1stLaxmipuram,

Guntur      ***                                                                                                                        

And

 

1) 

Age: 40 yrs, Occ:Agriculture,

R/o.Narasingapur (V), H/o.Itikalapally,

Narasmpet (M), Warangal Dist.

 

                                                                                                                                                     2) 

Warangal Dist.                                                                                               

         

 

 

 

FA Warangal     

 

Between:

 

1) 

Rep. by its Proprietor,

Opp.M.R.O.Office, R/o.Narasampet,

Warangal Dist.

 

2) 

Rep. by its Regional Manager

D.No. 5-87-48, 1stLaxmipuram,

Guntur                                                      ***                                                                                                                        

And

 

1) 

Age.30 yrs, Occ.Agriculture

R/o.Narsingapur (V), H/o.Itikalapally,

Narasmpet(M), Warangal Dist.

 

                                                                                                                                                  2) 

Warangal Dist.                                                                                               

                                     Counsel for the Appellants:                       

Counsel for the Resp:                                

G.P.                                                                   

CORAM:

              

                                     

&

                                                                       

WEDNESDAY

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble

 

                                                          

 

1)         

 

2)                       

 

3)                 

 

4)                  manufactured by Op2 for an amount of Rs. 557/-               

 

5)                       The farmers did not take proper precautionary measures or               Only when Op3        More over the farmers have    

 

6)                                            

 

visit on                  

 

 

7)                                  The manufacturer Op2    

 

8)                       

 

9)                       

 

10)                           

11)             

(i)      

sold by Op1 dealer?

(ii)     

(iii)    

 

12)              

 

 

 

S.No.

F.A. No.

C.D. No.

Claim

Award

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 damages

Damages + Costs

1

243

/2009

139

/2006

45,000/-

10,000/-

Pay compensation of Rs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,000/- with

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.5% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

with costs of Rs. 500/-

2

244

/2009

140

/2006

45,000/-

10,000/-

- do -

3

245

/2009

141

/2006

45,000/-

10,000/-

- do -

4

246

/2009

142

/2006

45,000/-

10,000/-

- do -

5

247

/2009

143

/2006

45,000/-

10,000/-

- do -

 

13)        manufactured by Op2 for an amount of Rs. 557/-       When the farmers could find that the plants were not yielding requisite  

 

14)                    

 

          

 

             

 

             name of popular 

 

 

              

 

             

 

 

Names of the complainants finds a    

                            susceptible to physiological shedding.   

 

                        

             under Ex. B18  

 

 

 

15)                

 

16)                 Chandra Reddy reported in III (1998) CPJ 8 (SC)   

 

In view of the letter written by the Agricultural Officer to the opposite parties to which they sent no reply it is clear that the same seeds that were purchased from the opposite parties were sown and they did not germinate. In view of the aforesaid letter of the Agricultural Officer, the District Forum felt that the seeds need not be sent for analysis. Moreover, if the opposite parties have disputed that the seeds were not defective they would have applied to the District Forum to send the samples of seeds from the said batch for analysis by appropriate laboratory. But the opposite parties have not chosen to file any application for sending the seeds to any laboratory. Since it is probable that the complainants have sown all the seeds purchased by them, they were not in a position to send seeds for analysis. In these circumstances, the order of the District Forum is not vitiated by the circumstances that it has not on its own accord sent the seeds for analysis by an appropriate laboratory……”

 

17)                Quoting with approval the law laid down inLucknow   

“The importance of the Act lies in promoting welfare of the society by enabling the consumer to participate directly in the market economy. It attempts to remove the helplessness of a consumer which he faces against powerful business, described as, `a network of rackets' or a society in which, producers have secured power' to 'rob the rest' and the might of public bodies which are degenerating into storehouses of inaction where papers do not move from one desk to another as a matter of duty and responsibility but for extraneous consideration leaving the common man helpless, bewildered and shocked. The malady is becoming so rampant, widespread and deep that the society instead of bothering, complaining and fighting against it, is accepting it as part of life. The enactment in these unbelievable yet harsh realities appears to be a silver lining, which may in course of time succeed in checking the rot."

 

 

 

 

 

18)               

 

19)                     

 

 

 

 

 

 

20)     

 

 

1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)      MEMBER

 

 

 

 

3)      MEMBER

 

 

      

*pnr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UP-LOAD – O.K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.