Kerala

Palakkad

CC/38/2013

V.J. Jeevandas - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Vamadevan - Opp.Party(s)

22 Feb 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/38/2013
 
1. V.J. Jeevandas
18/761(1) RC Road, Yakkara West, Palakkad - 678 014
Palakkad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Mr. Vamadevan
Kaniat Mana, Keezhillam Nagar, Perimbalacherry - 680 561
Palakkad
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MRS. Seena.H PRESIDENT
 HONARABLE MRS. Bhanumathi.A.K Member
 HONARABLE MRS. Preetha.G.Nair Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM PALAKKAD

Dated this the 22nd  day of February 2013

 

Present : Smt.Seena H, President

            : Smt. Preetha.G. Nair, Member

            : Smt. Bhanumathi.A.K, Member           Date of filing: 13/02/2013

 

(C.C.No.38/2013)

V.J.Jeevandas,

18/761(1), RC Road,

Yakkara West,

Palakkad – 678 014.                                        -      Complainant

(By party in person)

V/s

 

Vamadevan,

Kaniat Mana,

Keezhillam Nagar,

Perimbalacherry,

Thrissur – 680 561                                          -        Opposite party

 

O R D E R

 

By Smt.SEENA.H, PRESIDENT

Complaint in brief.

Complainant is the supplier of hollow bricks of terracotta material to various parts in Kerala and Tamilnadu.Complainant supplied 4,350 hollow bricks  to opposite party. Total cost amount to Rs.2,27,588/- of which opposite party paid only Rs.2,22,500/-. An amount of Rs.5,088/- is due to complainant. Hence complainant filed for realization of dues with compensation.

Complaint was posted for hearing on admission. Notice issued to complainant. Not present.  Hence taken for orders.

On going through the facts of the case, it is seen that the              subject  matter of the complainant is  not  at all a consumer dispute        within     the purview of the Consumer Protection Act. Complainant has not purchased any goods or  availed any service from opposite party. Hence complainant is not a consumer also. Complaint is purely a breach of contract for which remedy lies before the Civil Court.

In view of the above circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, we dismiss the complaint. Complainant directed to approach appropriate court for relief.

Pronounced in the open court on this the  22nd  day of February 2013.

 

    Sd/-

Seena H

President

 

    Sd/-

Preetha G Nair

Member

 

    Sd/-

Bhanumathi.A.K.

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MRS. Seena.H]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONARABLE MRS. Bhanumathi.A.K]
Member
 
[HONARABLE MRS. Preetha.G.Nair]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.