West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/204/2023

Mr. Mousam Ganguly, S/o- Paresh Nath Ganguly - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Soumen Roy Choudhuri, S/o- Late Narendra Nath Roy Choudhuri - Opp.Party(s)

Adv Banani Ghosh, Adv Md. Sajahan Kazi

14 Jul 2023

ORDER

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/204/2023
( Date of Filing : 26 Jun 2023 )
 
1. Mr. Mousam Ganguly, S/o- Paresh Nath Ganguly
Flat No.5A,4th floor,8Srinath Chakraborty Lane,P.S.-Baranagar,Kolkata-700035
2. Mrs. Kumkum Ganguly W/o Mr. Mousam Ganguly
Flat No.5A,4th Floor,8 Srinath Chakraborty Lane,P.S.-Baranagar,Kolkata-700035
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Mr. Soumen Roy Choudhuri, S/o- Late Narendra Nath Roy Choudhuri
D-502,Jal Vayu Towers,DJ/6,Action Area ,1D,New Town,P.O.& P.S.-New Town,Pin-700156
2. ..
..
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Gurudas Guin PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 14 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Complainants filed this case against Mr. Soumen Roy Choudhury alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the O.Ps. Case of the complainants in brief is that Complainants purchased a flat from Mr. Soumen Roy Choudhury - O.P.  who was enjoying a flat allotted the same to the complainants by executing a Deed of Assignment on 01.03.2022 . As per the said assignment the complainant paid consideration amount to the said Mr. Soumen Roy Choudhury in respect of a complete flat which has been enjoyed by Mr. Soumen Roy Choudhury.

 As per section 2(42) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 “service” means service of any description which is made available to potential users and includes, but not limited to, the provision of facilities in connection with banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing, supply of electrical or other energy, telecom, boarding or lodging or both, housing construction, entertainment, amusement or the purveying of news or other information, but does not include the rendering of any service free of charge or under a contract of personal service;”

In such view of the matter, we arrived at the decision that there is no relationship between the complainant and O.P. - developer as a consumer vis-a-vis service provider. Therefore, the instant case is not admissible under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Hence, the instant case being no. CC/204/2023 is dismissed being not admitted.

Let a plain copy be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR.

 

Dictated and corrected by

[HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar]
MEMBER

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Gurudas Guin]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.