West Bengal

Bankura

CC/120/2023

Tanoy Ghosh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Soumen Maity, Partner of M/S Bankura Next Generation Tractor Office - Opp.Party(s)

Samir Banerjee

24 Oct 2024

ORDER

IN    THE   DISTRICT   CONSUMER   DISPUTES   REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANKURA

  Consumer Complaint No.120/2023

    Date of Filing:  21/12/2023

Before:                                        

1. Samiran Dutta                                     Ld. President      

2. Siddhartha Sankar Bhui                     Ld. Member

 

For the Complainant: Ld. Advocate Samir Banerjee

For the O.P.: None

 

Complainant:

Tanoy Ghosh,S/O-Sitalchandra Ghosh,R/O-Vill-Tatarpur,P.O-Duria Radhaballavpur,P.S-Anandapur,Dist-Paschim Medinipur,Pin-721122,W.B,Mob-6296779851

Opposite Party:

1. Mr. Soumen Maity,Partner of M/S Bankura Next Generation Tractor  Office at Bikna,P.O-Keshiakole,P.S&Dist-Bankura,W.B-722155,Mob-9933673297/6294652075
2. M/S Bankura Next Generation Tractor Office at Bikna,P.O-Keshiakole,P.S&Dist-Bankura,W.B-722155                                                                                                                                                          

FINAL ORDER / JUDGEMENT

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Order No.12

Dated:24-10-2024

Complainant files hazira through Advocate.

No step is taken by the O.P. who is found absent on repeated call.

Notice was duly served upon the O.P. through e-mail.

No W.V. has been filed within the statutory period.

The case is taken up for Ex-Parte hearing.

The Complainant’s case is that he made an advance of Rs.60,000/- under receipt dated: 22/03/2023 to the O.P. for purchase of a Rice Harvester Machine No. being DC-68-GHK2 in exchange of the old Harvesting Machine but the Complainant neither received the delivery of the product nor the return of the advance money despite reminder through Advocate’s letter dated: 12/06/2023 and thereafter self-written communication dated: 26/07/2023.

                                                                                                                                                                                     Contd……p/2

Page: 2

Perused the petition of complaint and the documents on record.

Heard Ld. Advocate for the Complainant.

Prima-facie case of the Complainant is well established.

The Complainant is entitled to get the relief as prayed for.

Hence it is ordered…….

That the case be and the same is allowed Ex-Parte against the O.P. but without cost.

O.P. is directed to pay to the Complainant Rs.60,000/- with Litigation Cost of Rs.10,000/- within a month from this date in default law will take its own course.

Both parties be supplied copy of this Order free of cost.

 

     __________________                                   ________________                            

 HON’BLE   PRESIDENT                           HON’BLE    MEMBER