A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ATHYDERABAD.
F.A. 486/2006 against C.D. 112/2005, Dist. Forum,Guntur.
Between:
The
3rdKrishnaGuntur,
Rep. by its Asst. P.F. Commissioner
1. Shaik Siddamma
W/o. Late Pullaiah
R/o. Kalealaa Bazar
D.No. 7-2-100, Mazid Line
Donka Road,Guntur. 2. K. Suryanayana
Managing Partner
M/s. Sri Shirdi Saibaba Tobacco Traders
Mangalagiri Road
Guntur.
Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondent:
QUORUM:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO, PRESIDENT
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
Guntur
The case of Mangalgiri Road,Guntur
Opposite Party No. 1 filed was its employee. It discharged its duty by forwarding the application of the complainant duly furnishing the particulars available with it.
The years. Guntur enrolled as member
under A/c. No. AP/2079/964. Therefore it prayed for dismissal of the complaint with costs.
she was
Guntur
Undoubtedly, Employees’ Pension Schemes 1997 as well as 1995 provided that a person, who was already a member of the scheme of 1971 and who was under employment as on 16.11.1995 would automatically become a member of
It is an undisputed fact that the complainant was an employee with 2nd
The appellant contends that for the first time she rendered service for 10 years 5 months. In all she had put
Though the appellant alleged that the complainant was admitted to the fund on 1.3.1974,
Ex. B1 to B3 documents filed by the appellant would in no way show that she ceased to be a member
In
Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the schemes formulated therein are beneficial piece of social welfare legislation aimed at promoting and securing the well being of the employees and the Court will not adopt a narrow interpretation which will have the effect of defeating the very object and purpose of the Act.
Therefore, when she was
The order of the District Forum is confirmed.
PRESIDENT
Dt. 29. 12. 2008.
