Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/389/2018

C. Rajendran - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Sarma - Opp.Party(s)

S. Natarajan

03 Jun 2022

ORDER

                                                                      

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI (NORTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

 

PRESENT : THIRU. G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L.,                            :PRESIDENT

                                  TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E.,                           : MEMBER-I

                        THIRU.V.RAMAMURTHY,B.A.,B.L.,PGDLA.,    :MEMBER-II

                      

FRINDAY THE 03^rd   DAY OF JUNE 2022

C.C.NO.389/2018

 

C.Rajendran,

1 Pillayal koil street,

West Mambalam,

Chennai-33

                                                                                          …..Complainant

 ..Vs..

 

1.Sarma,

Direction, Purple Optical (P) Ltd.,

210 Anna Salai,

Thousand Lights

Chennai-6

 

2.Manager,

Purple Optical (P) Ltd.,

#:19/38 Jains Brindavan,

Brindavan street,

West Mambalam,

Chennai-33.

.....Opposite Parties

Counsel for Complainant                          : M/s. S.Natarajan

 

Counsel for  opposite parties                       : M/s.S.Stanley John & M.Kumar

 

 

ORDER

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,

          This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

          The complainant filed this complaint  against the opposite parties  to repay the cost of glasses Rs.4500/- with interest @ 24% from 27.11.2011 onwards till repayment and to pay Rs.50,000/- for the resultant mental agony and pain caused by such deficiency of service and to pay Rs.10,000/- for the unfair trade practice committed by sale of defective glasses contrary to the assurances of quality service give and to pay Rs.5000/- as costs of this complaint.

          Complainant and absent.  Passed over.  No representation till 12.07pm.  2012 matter pending for long time.  No progress.  Opposite party absent.  Complainant counsel reported died.  Complainant notice served.  But complainant absent.  Hence,  complaint is dismissed for default.

Order Pronounced dated 03^rd   June  2022.

 

MEMBER  I            MEMBER  II                                              PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

3