Basically this is a complaint as against the respondent/architect.  It appears that slab of the building belonging to the appellant was having a leakage and therefore, walls were becoming wet.  Said work was given to one civil contractor / Mr.Prvainbhai Patel / M/s. Prime Decorator.  They are not party to the complaint.  The grievance of the complainant is that the work was not properly  supervised by the respondent and therefore, the work which was carried by the contractor was of substandard quality.  Even there was appointment order in favour the respondent.  There was no agreement creating legal obligations between the parties fixing the duties and work to be completed.  It was told before us that separate complaint by the Civil Contractor is filed before Civil Court and it was partly allowed and execution is pending.  Under these circumstances, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has also found that in the absence of said civil contract, it is not possible to proceed as against the said contractor.  We find no difficulty in the said order.  Hence, we pass the following order:-

:-ORDER-:

1.  Appeal stands rejected. 2.  No order as to costs.

3. Copies of the order herein be furnished to the parties.