Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/237/2018

The Managing Director, ETA General Ltd, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34 - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Sajid P. Jose, Spur Tank Road, Chetpet, Chennai-31 and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. K. Jayaraman

28 Jun 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                             MEMBER

 

F.A. No.237/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.12.04.2016 made in C.C. No.194/2013 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North))

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

 

The Managing Director,

ETA General Ltd.,

ETA STAR House,

No.71/63, 3^rd Floor,

Sterling Road,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai – 600 034.                                                     .. Appellant / 1^st Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

1. Mr. Sajid P. Jose,

G.A. Madalene Court,

Spur Tank Road,

Chetpet,

Chennai – 600 031.                                                  .. 1^st Respondent  / Complainant.

 

2. The Manager,

Jai Air Systems,

No.19/11, New Street,

Kodambakkam,

Chennai – 600 034.

 

3. The Manager,

Abirami Audios and Videos,

New No.170, Old No.305 E,

T.T.K. Road,

Alwarpet,

Chennai – 600 018.                           .. Respondents 2 & 3 / Opposite parties 2 & 3.

 

Counsel for Appellant / 1^st Opposite party        : M/s. K. Jayaraman

Counsel for 1^st Respondent  / Complainant      : M/s. V. Balaji

Respondents 2 & 3 / Opposite parties 2 & 3    : Appeal dismissed

 

               This appeal is coming up before us on 28.06.2023 for appearance of the appellant, for filing written arguments of the appellant and 1^st respondent and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket Order

 

1^st Respondent present and ready for arguments. No representation for the appellant.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant, for filing written arguments of the appellant and 1^st respondent and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No costs.

 

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                                             Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                                 R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                                 PRESIDENT