West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/90/2024

Sri Shambhu Kumar Choudhary - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Sagnik Saha - Opp.Party(s)

Rajiv Kumar Choudhary

06 Jun 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/90/2024
( Date of Filing : 07 May 2024 )
 
1. Sri Shambhu Kumar Choudhary
Netaji Subhas Road ,P.O.- Pangarh Bazar ,P.S.-Kanksa ,Paschim Bardhaman -713148,W.B.and presently companying at 4A,Council House Street ,1St Floor ,Room No.D/1,Kolkata-700001
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Mr. Sagnik Saha
Hindustan Unilever LImited,Regional office -East ,Brooke House -9,Shakespeare sarani ,Kolkata -700071,W.B.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Sukla Sengupta PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Reyazuddin Khan MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Rajiv Kumar Choudhary, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 06 Jun 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 4                            Dated: 06.06.2024

Today is fixed for admission hearing.

Representative of the complainant is present. Heard Representative of the complainant on admissibility of the Consumer Complaint.

On perusal of the complaint petition it appears that the complainant purchased a Kissan Pine Appeal Jam from grocery shop of Brijesh Agarwal & Sons, Kirana Merchant located at Panagarh Bazar, Paschim Bardhaman on 20.01.2024. After purchasing it is found that a non edible substance like Iron Nut Bolt is present at the bottom of the sealed pack of the alleged product and the complainant has verbally requested the said shop to resolve the issue in question but no fruitful result and accordingly the complainant has filed the instant case with the prayer for passing order as per prayer portion of the complainant. 

It also reveals that the complainant has filed the case against 5 OPs for deficiency in service whereas OPs-1 to 3 carry their business within the jurisdiction of this Commission and the other 2 OPs carry their business outside the jurisdiction of this Commission even the complainant also resides outside the jurisdiction of this Commission. Surprisingly Brijesh Agarwal & Sons, Kirana Merchant, grocery shop has not been made as a party in the instant case.

In view of the above, we are of the opinion that unless the said grocery shop has not been made as a party, the matter cannot be adjudicated even no petition praying for permission has been filed for the complainant against the OPs-4 and 5 as the said OPs carry their business outside the jurisdiction of this Commission.

On the above observation, we are not inclined to admit the instant Consumer Complaint in its present form and rejected accordingly being non joinder of necessary parties.

However, the complainant is at liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action on the observation made in the body of the order, if so advised, and if not, otherwise barred by law.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sukla Sengupta]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Reyazuddin Khan]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.