BEFORE THE HYDERABAD

F.A.No.941 OF 2008 AGAINST C.C.No.54 OF 2007 DISTRICT FORUMKURNOOL

Between:

1.                  

2.                                

3.                         

A N D

S.Laxmi Narayana
S/oS.HanumanthaRao
A.SivaRamaPuramVillage
Nandyal Mandal
Kurnool District

                                                               Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondent

FA No. 90 OF 2011 AGAINST C.C.NO.54 OF 2007

Between:

S.Laxmi Narayana
S/o S.Hanumantha Rao
aged about 37 years
A.Siva Rama Puram Village
Julepalli Post, Nandyal Mandal
Kurnool District

1.                   2.                  3.                                

Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondent

AND

SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

                                       1.    

2.    

3.    

4.      

5.           `6000/- per acre, the complainant used fertilizers and pesticides as per the instructions of the Field Assistants to NSC, besides incurred expenses for plantation.  

6.      AacharayaN.G.RangaAgriculturalUniversity.  

7.           `60,125/- towards deficit yield and`2,16,302/- towards proportion cost of fertilizers and pesticides and ignored the report of the scientists that there was 2% variation in the seed.  

9.    

10.          

11.     `60,125/- has been awarded in favour of the complainant. `2,16,302/- towards costs of fertilizers and pesticides in additi9on to the award for`60,125/- is not sustainable and liable to be set aside.  

12.    `2,16,302/- towards costs incurred for fertilizers and pesticides is set aside rest of the order is upheld.   

                                                                                                                                      KMK*