7. The complainant took admission so that he would save a year and would complete his education. But the assurance of OP-1 has spoiled his whole year and hard work. The complainant had to visit the institute 20-25 times in the whole year and telephoned to OP-1 so many times but never resolved problems. OP-1 provided false information that he did not receive the admission fee back from University after rejection of his application and complainant will get the same from University. If complainant would not have written to University then probably the complainant would not have come to know about the falseness of information furnished by the OP-1. The complainant was very much stressed and nobody can give him back his valuable time. Also for the last 5 months the complainant have been visiting the study centre, calling the OP-1 and writing mails many times but only got false assurances and trouble instead of admission fee refund.
8. Since the OPs despite service of notice failed to appear therefore were placed exparte. Thereafter, the complainant was called upon to file his affidavit evidence. Accordingly, the complainant filed his affidavit evidence in lieu of oral evidence.
9. Perused the allegations made in the complaint, the sworn testimony of the complainant, various documents filed by him and other material placed on record.
10. In his affidavit evidence the complainant stated that during the pendency of the complaint a sum of Rs.11,700/- has been transferred to his account towards refund of fee by OPs on 01.09.2015.
11. The allegations made in the complaint, the sworn testimony of the complainant coupled with various documents filed by the complainant goes to establish that the OPs have failed to get necessary admission to the complainant at Lovely Professional University as promised by them. Moreover, the OPs have kept the complainant in dark for a long time regarding the rejection of his admission by the said Lovely Professional University thereby causing huge mental agony to the complainant. The OPs informed the complainant about rejection of his admission only when he went to submit his assignment on 10.12.2014. This conduct of the OPS must have put the complainant to hardship and inconvenience apart from severe mental agony. Though the complainant has received back the admission fee of Rs.11,700/- during pendency of this complaint, but he has not been compensated for the loss of one academic year due to deficiency in service on the part of the OPs. The OPs did not appear and explain in the circumstances leading to the rejection of the admission of the complainant by the Lovely Professional University. Therefore, we have not hesitation to hold that the OPs alone are responsible for the loss of academic year of the complainant and for hardship and mental agony suffered by him throughout. Therefore, the OPs shall have to be directed to pay compensation of Rs.15,000/- for the deficiency in service resulting in hardship and inconvenience to the complainant together with litigation cost of Rs.3,000/-.
12. In the result we proceed to pass the following:
O R D E R
The complaint filed U/s.12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the complainant is allowed in part. OPs.1 & 2 jointly and severally directed to OPs are directed to pay a compensation of Rs.15,000/- to the complainant towards deficiency of service together with litigation costs of Rs.3,000/-.
OPs shall comply the order passed by this Forum within a month from today.
Furnish free copy of this order to both the parties.
(Dictated to the Stenographer, got it transcribed and corrected, pronounced in the Forum on this 31st day of December 2015)
MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT
Vln/Nrs*
COMPLAINT NO.990/2015
Complainant - Sri. Vinit Kumar,
Bangalore-560 037.
-vs-
Opposite Parties - 1) Mr. Praveen Varma,
Centre Manager.
2) Mr.Kunal,
Centre Director,
Bangalore-560041.
Witnesses examined on behalf of the complainant dated 29.09.2015.
- Sri. Vinit Kumar,